First off, THANK YOU SO MUCH to Khajitt for editing this for me!!!! So now all the speling and grammar and aparently style too is beter so credit for edits to Khajitt! Thanks again!!!!
Hi again!
I haven’t been on really for the last week, and that’s because I’ve been really sick. I had this awful flu and I felt super lousy, basically all I could do was to lie on the couch drinking ginger ale and watch movies while trying not to move and not to puke.
Anyway though, while I was sick, I had a lot of time on my hands, so first thing I did was watching all of my twilight movies once again. Then I decided that I’d watch the Harry Potter movies (I have them all at my house because my little sister is a big fan) too and I would compare them a little bit. Of course I am probably a bit biased in favor of Twilight because I am such a huge fan of it, but I am trying to be kind and fair in my comparison.
The Twilight movies were definitely better than the Harry Potter ones, and I honestly did like Harry Potter, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t, it’s just that Twilight is just so much better, and here’s why:
1. The Twilight movies stick to the books better. Twilight movies are practically the books, just in film. They stick really closely to the books and don’t make weird changes. Also all of the characters match their descriptions, like Edward, Jacob and Bella – all match their physical descriptions in the books. In HP… not so much. For example, Percy Weasley in HP is supposed to wear glasses, and he didn’t wear them in the movie; Harry’s scar is supposed to be in the middle of his forehead and not way of the side. Thus Harry Potter movies are much less faithful to the books.
2. The Twilight movies have better music. The soundtracks got me into all these awesome Indian and rock bands music, and all the HP soundtracks are just classical melodies. No words or lyrics! I admit that sometimes the music just sets the mood and you don’t need lyrics. That works for a movie, so there is no need to waste resources to make a CD of it. I mean, who listens to boring classical stuff like that? The Twilight soundtracks are real music. The Harry Potter soundtracks are just made by people trying to make a quick buck.
3. The Twilight movies don’t drastically change the characters’ appearances. For example, Dumbledore looked completely different after the first two movies – there were major costume, wig and makeup changes. It was almost like a whole different person. I mean, seriously, that’s just awful that they did that! I do admit that the actor who played Dumbledore after the second movie was better, but couldn’t they make him look the same? And Malfoy had his hair slicked back in the first 2 movies, and then they just let it out, and then in the 6th movies, they put gel in it again! Make up your mind! And Hermione! She has frizzy hair in the first two, and then cute waves in the rest. I mean seriously, be realistic! Don’t change character appearances like that!
4. The Twilight movies are really meaningful. There’s awesome dialogue sequences and they talk about important stuff. The Harry Potter movies are mainly just a ton of action and yes, these is some important dialogue, but not as much as Twilight. And most of the important stuff gets cut out of the movies. Remember the 6th movie? It was almost nothing like the book, and they cut out most of the memories Dumbledore shows Harry!
5. Ok, this isn’t a reason why Twilight is better, but I would just like to state that the Harry Potter movies have really good special effects. For example, they made Hagrid look huge, all the characters look freaky and wizardly, and they made a castle and dragons, so go HP special effects guys! And Twilight had awesome special effects too, like the vampires sparkling and the super speed and strength and things like that, not to mention all the blood, so go Twilight special effects guys too!
6. Twilight just has a better plot. That is all.
7. And the Twilight characters are better looking too.
Anyway, thanks for reading.
-Peace
-LizzieBella
Twilight Gurls 
God, you’re a dipshit. The reason Dumbledore looks different in the first two movies is because he’s played by a different actor. WHO DIED. You can’t make people look exactly like some one else. The reason Harry Potter movies don’t seem to have meaningful dialoge to you is because you need to have passed kindergarden to understand it. Twilight has amazing special effects. Can you feel my sarcasm? CAN YOU FEEL IT?!? Yes, a 18 year old girl trying to kill herself because her abusive boyfriend dumped her clingy and bitchy ass makes an amazing plot. CAN YOU FEEL IT YET?!? They change a characters hair? So? It’s not like I have the same hair I had at 10. Really, better music? Harry Potter has it’s own themesong. We don’t need to be reminded how ZOMG HAWT edwart is every 5 sentences. God, you make me want to bludgeon small children to death with puppies. Oh, and tell your sister she has good taste.
You have made my day! 😀
why thank you 🙂
No problem! 😀
Someone is not smart
Indian music…… I think you meant Indie. And No. Just no. Twilight uses “Indie” music (Of course you have to be an idiot and count Bruno Mars and Christina Perri as Indie…) Anyway back to the point, the only reason that Twilight uses Indie music is because they’re to cheap to hire some person who makes music. So they just mooch off of terrible pop artists.
So stop trying to be hipster. Twilight used that one horrible song in their movie.
Now maybe if they included some Two Door Cinema Club… I might not want to burn everything with the world “TWILIGHT” on it.
*loves your comment*
Hey Maya, marry me!
I looked this page up because a friend said it’s hilarious. She said she couldn’t make up her mind whether it was trolling or truth, and to be honest neither can I.
Point is, the pity I feel for the Keeper of the Blog is unfathomable. As you said, bludgeoning kids with puppies aptly describes the frustration, and reading this blog made me want to do just that, in addition to pulling my hair out.
Just Avada Kedavra this person’s blog and the world will be better 😀 Harry potter is so much better.
She’s so obviously a muggle!
Omg. I just bursted out in laughter as I read this stuff about Dumbledore. 😀
I love your comment. Couldn´t have made it better.
You’re my hero. Simple as that.
You…are my new hero. Here, have a cookie.
In fact, have all my cookies ❤
I think I love you. ;D Just kidding..but that was hilarious.
Lmao..you said it all.
” Twilight characters are better looking too”! Um… what?!!! Bella looks like she got hit with something big and metal when she was a baby.
ikrr!! i totally agree with u
No, but seriously, Cedric Diggory was hot. And then they turned a cute teenage boy into some freaky dead-eyed evil-looking thingamabob.
Um…. You… You… Love…..omg…. Marry…. Ahhhh
*dies* of pure joy
Thank you for that. In regards to the hair thing, the first to movies had a different director than the rest of the movies. Go ahead and watch the first Twilight film. Bella’s hair looks nothing like that in the rest of the films. And about the music, they’re called film scores and I happen to have a lot of film scores on my iPod. The movies are very faithful to the books. Yes, they change some stuff and yes they add some stuff. That’s what makes it interesting. And just because you think the actors are better looking is not a valid reason to go on the internet and say that Twilight is better. That is your opinion, not a fact.
I agree; Tell your sister she is very awesome… You on the other hand….
“6. Twilight just has a better plot. That is all.”
Really?
awkward that twilight has no plot…
ZOMG!! yes! you have made mty life. Everything you have said in your comment is all me and my friend were saying. and I must say, they did in fact make an effort to keep Dumbledore looking quite similar to the R.I.P’d actor. I love it when people try to make things as they are not.
I was with MarySunshine
thank you thank you thank you. My friend and I read thins and picked out every thing we wanted to tear apart and then we saw that you already had. You are a Potter Head’s hero.
My friend is IamLakm. And I meant this not thins.
yay!
I love you. Marry me. You are so intelliget. Lets have heavy bdsm sex. Lesbian sex, if you are a girl. And for you Lizzie, even I, Dumbles hater #1, cried when i found out that the person that used to be Dumbles died. So suck it bitch
yeah thats right… the person who wrote this is sooooo STUPID..twilight SUCKS… you filthy loathsome evil stupid Muggle!!!!
You are an incredible human being!
You r d best!!!!
I’m too lazy to scroll to the bottom so…
The reason the look different is because the actor DIED. You can’t make two people look the same. Also, the characters changed because of puberty. They didn’t want to change the actors again (but you would probably complain if they did that, too), so they just left it.
You are awesome! Also, Lizze, work on your writing it terrible. Oh, and even your beloved actor Robert Patterson says he hates Twilight and Edward, that means something.
harry potter is so much better
“after all this time”
“always”
Lizzybella- 1. You sister rocks
2. The actor who played dumbledore died
3.The twilight plot consists of a stalkirish pedafile lusting over a 16 year old……..
I love you right now. YOU FREAKIN GODDESS!
I love you right now xD
Sometimes, I wonder if this site is just entertainment for Potterheads. And hun: better spelling and grammar. Lipstick. On. A. Pig.
I agree *sitting in a corner LMAO*
Faith in humanity restored
I WAS LITERALLY ABOUT TO RANT ABOUT HOW WRONG THIS GIRL WAS!!!! THEN YOU DID IT FOR ME!!!! You have made my week. Hopefully this girl will start thinking. UI doubt it thoug
thank you so much. honestly, who does she think she is. and i know i sound bitchy but twilight teaches girls that they aren’t anyone without a guy while harry potter is about courage and friendship and dealing with changes and overcoming difficulties
I now officially love you. You are AWSOME
Wait khajitt? Didn’t he comment on one of her articles?
i didn’t quite have the courage to say this. so glad someone did. you go girl!
Daaaaamn you are so retarded, no way people can help you and take you out of that hole your mind is living.
I’m pretty sure you are also a beliver. That retardedness only match a twilight and a bieber fan.
Ahem.
Belieber.
That is all.
Okay, now I have to correct you again…
1. They don’t. I have read them. All of them. All from Philosopher’s stone to Deathly Hallows, and from Twilight to Breaking Dawn. They don’t. None of them is exactly like the movie. For example, where are Bella’s dreams of that lovely child? Where are other of things they had in book and didn’t have in movies? Also many things are missing from the books because the books have only Bella’s view (I know there is a part for Jacob’s view in BD but still they have added a lot to movies)
2. Seems that you don’t really like classical music which some people (like me…) actually like. Yes, Harry Potter doesn’t have any pop songs as soundtrack but so what? Have you noticed that Twilight movies also have classical music? (The score. Just like Harry Potter)
And by the way, most of the music in Harry Potter soundtrack and Twilight score is by the same composer, Alexandre Desplat (tarkista oikea nimi), so now you are also talking about man behind the Twilight score being a man trying to make a quick buck.
3. Everyone of Harry Potter fans know that Dumbledore looked different because Richard Harris died after second movie. No one can expect the nextone look exactly like him. And also, the characters changed just because they GREW UP. Now when I’m 18, I absolutely don’t look exactly same as when I was 11. Because Twilight is so short time movie, you don’t see them growing up any.
Draco: first he has to look like a little badass, like an adult gangster. Then he becomes a teen rebel and so does his look. Then he becomes “an adult” gangster.
Hermione: just like my hair was frizzy in elementary school, it straightened a little while I grew up. And so did Hermione’s hair.
And btw, Edward looks too old in last 3 (or actually 4) movies, he looked young in the first but then he became old looking. He looked too much like a man and too less like a 17 years old boy.
4. They talk about important stuff? “I don’t want to live without you Edward, please kill me and make me be like you.” That is important? Yay…
5. The special effects in Hagrid is a huge stunt (he is much larger than Hagrid’s real actor) and big shoes. Also they made so many miniature things that were 30% smaller than normal ones for Hagrid scenes. They did hardly anything with computer. Castle: miniature model and some real sized parts. Dragons and other mythical creatures: robots. Sparkling vampires are not vampires.. They are blood sucking fairies… Superspeed and strength, not so affective… Too.. basic. Blood? Well, at least it doesn’t look like red paint (like in Sweeney Todd) But great effects in Twilight? Those are hardly special effects so, no.
6. Twilight plot in nutshell:
1st part: Bella is new girl at school – She sees Edward, instantly in love – Edward tells her he is a vampire – visits her at night (creepy) and tells that he does it every night (even creepier) – takes her to his house – baseball match – hunting starts – escape to Phoenix – Bella almost dies – School prom.
2nd part – Bella’s birthday, Jasper almost kills Bella because of PAPERCUT – Edward leaves Bella – Bella turns into a zombie for months – then back to school – tries to find danger to see Edward – starts to hang up with Jacob – almost kills herself several times – Jacob falls in love with her – Edward tries to kill himself – Bella saves him.
3rd part: main point is the war against newborns and Victoria and peace between werewolves and vampires
4th part: Bella and Edward get married – Honeymoon – Bella pregnant – baby almost kills her – Bella turns into a vampire – Volturi are coming – many other vampires come to protect Renesmee – Volturi come, kill Irene and go away – They live happily ever after.
Really nice…
7. That’s still just a matter of taste and should not be a statement for better movie
Points valid people. I’m neither side’s fan, commenting from a neutral point of view- Twilight and HP are 2 different standards. I don’t like Twilight, she did not see the criticisms of the show how poorly they adapted the books to the movies. I’ve seen some HP movies and felt they were really fantastic. Stephanie’s style is marysue, the girl only likes one or two of the extremely perfect soulmates which is not realistic. Because of Twilight kind of plots, some pple won’t give a chance to Really awesome writers.
To Twigurl, some improvements on the grammar. I think you shouldn’t post anymore or you’d just be flamed. Watch some other movies, how about the Avengers? Now, that’s a wonderful series and the Thor movie was superb!
I’m going to add this. The blood in Sweeny Todd looked paint rather then real blood for a reason. They choose to make it look unrealistic so it would stand out.
i totally agree with you (high five!) potterheads all the wayy ❤
twihards down the drain
Sigh. Child, you’re an uneducated piece of work. Good grief, your parents must be so proud!
Question: I wonder if her parents have actually seen this, I mean the first what six blogs were terrible and then the only reason she’s done the teeniest bit better is because she got her self a beta…. not so great… me thinks her parents should be informed and call the men in white coats.
and straight jackets!
you must be fucking retarded you stupid bitch
You are a disgrace to the human race. I
I’d ought to seek advice from you here. Which is not something I do! I adore reading an article that could make people feel. Also, many thanks allowing me to comment!
Smh…..i have too many words for how retarded you actually are child….The only thing good about the twilight movies are the shifters….cause the cgi for em is pretty good…but other then that, those movies cannot keep my interest in the least, by the time the movie is over i am ready to sleep or rip my hair out, because of how dramatically stupid Bella is. At least Harry potter has a lesson behind it, good role models….twilights message is fall desperatly in love……try to kill yourself…..get married young…..get pregnant with a baby…..die……become a vampire.
Oh God, I dont think you realise just how much hate your getting! But still I would like to point out a load of things that I think you should know!
1) If the Harry Potter films were to stick to the books, the films would be 16 hours long. Some things in books are impossible to do in films and therefore had to be lef out. Also some bits dragged on too long for the audience to be interested.
2) First things first it’s indie rock. Indie is short for independant, when you talk about music! Secondly the Harry Potter soundtrack is classical music, no lyrics are needed. The Harry Potter soundtrack is very famous. Im 13 and I would happily sit down and listen to it any day!
3) The person who played Dubledore at first, yeah he died! Emma Watson grew older, therefore her hair changed! How was changing Draco’s hair style a dramatic change we as human being change our style all the time, just because it is fantasy doesnt mean they dont do the same!
4) WOW what, so quotes like…..”Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, so long one remembers to turn on the light” or “just because its in your head doesn’t mean it can’t be real” are not important! Really they are so insperational!
5) Yes Harry Potter has good CGI!
6) WTF No it doesn’!
7) So Tom Felton, James Phelps, Oliver Phelps, Rupert Grint, Daniel Radcliffe, Matt Lewis and Alan Rickman are not good looking!?!?
Also just to point out Twilight has a low level musical, which is only famous as it had Lauren Lopez (BEST DRACO EVER!!!!) in it.
Harry Potter has…….. Two musicals, several thousand spoof music vidoes, one theme park and the Warnrer Bros Studio Tour (WHICH IS IN ENGLAND AND I LIVE 10 MINUTES AWAY FROM IT!!!!). Hmmm which sounds more popular!
Alan Rickman?! Hes like 80!!
He’s 66 you twit and he’s sure as hell a lot more good looking then most of the guys in Twishit.
Actually, honey, he’s sixty-six and fucking sexy.
I agree with Blue Wrackspurts.
Alan Rickman is FUCKING sexy! 😀
NEVER INSULT ALAN RICKMAN INFRONT OF ME!!!!
HEY DUMB BITCH HE’S 66 not 80 and a lot more good looking and sexier than those fairies with blood fetish you call “vampires”
NO INSULTING ALLEN RICKMAN IS NOT FUCKING ALLOWED IN MY DOJO – backslaps-
babe, Edward is like 130! oops!
you love twilight just bcoz of the actor… not the story!!! we potterheads LOVE THE STORY MORE THAN THE ACTOR…and even though the actors are not so good looking BUT WE STILL LIKE THEM…
Yes he is
And out of everything up there, u choz to notice THT?! Sort out your priorities, just like your beloved Bella does
He looks better than Edward
And still cuter than Edward.
Robert Pattinson DID appear in one of the HP movies
So, if you think the guys in HP movies are not good-looking, Pattinson is one of them. If they aren’t good-looking, Pattinson also isn’t good-looking either!!!
Then Twilight actors aren’t good-looking either !
And I need to apologize for my bad English
Please don’t expect a ten-year-old non-native English speaker to have good English🙏
This blog just got less funny and troll-ish.
Sad Blue is sad.
It was just, JUST bearable until you criticised classical music. NO ONE criticises my classical music. Especially the Harry Potter movies’ music.
Without classical music, your precious ‘real music’ wouldn’t even exist thank you very much.
Richard Harris DIED!!!! That is why he looked different then Michael Gambon changed his appearance according to what he was comfortable with in the mean time agreeing it with Jo.
Composers choose different scores to go with different films, Harry Potter needed more of a classical edge to it as it is more serious. Twilight needed a more teenage, more common note to it. That is the whole point of the score and themes, again LOOK UP YOUR POINTS BEFORE SHOUTING THEM TO THE WORLD OF WHICH MOST OF THE POPULATION DOES NOT WISH TO SEE. Grow up. Please. For the sake of your descendent’s, if any, because if you pass this knowledge on to them, god help America because there is no hope for human kind if this is the future.
As for appearance’s: did you look the same way at 11-12 as you do no, no I some how I don’t think so. NON ONE LOOKS/ DRESSES/ ACTS/ OR DOES THEIR HAIR THE SAME FROM WHEN THEY WERE 11 IF THEY ARE NOW 15-16. I’m 18 and I look very different from when I was 11, and another thing, you cannot base a point on a movie being better on weather the actor is hot or not and by the way Harry Potter had Robert Patterson first, remember. Goblet of Fire. He dies right at the end.
Get a life girl, please for the sake of females and human kind. Plus talk about something different other than Twilight, or Harry Potter, your doing my nut in.
#3– yes, it WAS said, but he DIED, You THINK he wanted to die?… well… now I’m afraid for the human race, if these… pieces of paper with ink on them have been polluting the brain cells of young people like this. (I’m afraid if the HP books count as ‘books’ than Twi-derp does Nott.)
(you see? I’m SMART, and I can throw a HP reference into regular conversation. [or is that obsession? *shrugs*])
INDIAN MUSIC?
The proper term is “Indie.” Short for “Independent.”
You insulted classial music? WOW. JUST WOW.
People change. Actors die, and no two people can look exactly the same.
Credits to Khajitt for their editing skills! and this is meant in the nicest way possible considering you constantly put down one of my favourite book series, but we get it already? I actually think I might take you more seriously if you wrote articles on other topics too, not just to bash HP. This is coming from someone who doesn’t hate Twilight, I just prefer Harry Potter, and I see them as completely separate fandoms who each have their own opinion. Why don’t you try to write about something else for a change? Or even try to think your points through a little more although I do appreciate the efforts you are making to find some kind of middleground (eg: Go hp special effects guys!) (oh and btw by saying the hp actors aren’t hot, you’re saying robert pattinson isn’t hot.. just a thought)
I can’t agree more
Yeah, the only reason why Dumbledore changed is because the original actor (Richard Harris, R.I.P) fucking DIED, you idiot! Seriously, I thought you couldn’t get any worse at this shit but apparently (even with a beta reader, god forbid her mind, she must be going crazy reading this shit and editing it) I was wrong.
Unlike you unrealistic, sparkly ass vampires, in Harry Potter people who DIE stay DEAD, not come back as a stupid vampire, not phase into a werewolf, they simply DIE! So I’m sorry if that caused an inconvenience but I’ve now got to go to Mr Harris’ grave and calm him down, he’s spinning in it right now.
And I think you’ll find your precious Twilight movies didn’t even come close to making as much as the least successful Harry Potter movie, proving all your ‘reasons’ to be complete bullshit.
Good day.
^like
Thanks 😀
Dissing Twilight Like a Sir 🙂
Damn right! 😀
But its more like a Madam, I’m a girl 😛
Sorry :P, Dissing Twilight like a madam 😀
Potter fans were here way before twilight fans and we are more in numbers !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHA 😀 your so fuckin retarded i want to kill myself, but i wont. You dumb ass twilight fans, i feel sorry for you guys, you guys don’t know the difference between your ass and your face. You make other fans look completely and utterly normal to an extent so great it rivals the normality of a butterfly sitting atop a flower, or a bird flying in the sky. You GUYS ARE SO FUNNY!!!! it amuses me. even homestuck fans seem normal and we know we are not XP. …
Were you born with no brain or did your stupidity gradually form as you got older?
The Twilight movies murdered the books. If you noticed after the the movies came out for twilight, the haters were bron and it is a complete disgrace to HP if you are comparing HP to the poor excuse for a book called twilight.
I thought I’d make a list as to why the Harry Potter movies are better than the Twilight movies.
1. If the movie stuck to the whole book, it’s go for like 5 hours. There was just too much information and not enough time. They tried to keep the book but it was too hard. And most of the people fit their descriptions. Percy did wear glasses. And so what if Harry’s scar was on the left a bit?
2. The Harry Potter soundtrack was all original stuff written by John Williams (for the first three movies) who also did the Star Wars Saga. A lot of people enjoy classical. And the music composed helped tell the story. All of the songs in Twilight were just random songs put together that matched the mood of Twilight. Not really original. Classical is more real than the crap on the Twilight soundtrack.
3. Dumbledore looked different because the man playing Dumbledore, Richard Harris, died after the second movie. That’s why it was like a whole different person, because it was! It would’ve been way too hard to make them look the same. Who cares about Draco’s hair!? And Hermione was meant to look different you daft bimbo.
4. Have you not heard the conversations Harry, Ron and Hermione have!? There is a lot of important dialogue in Harry Potter. If you don’t listen to it you miss what happens. And they didn’t really have to show all the memories, yes it would’ve been nice to add in Tom’s family but it was too hard to add those things in!
5. Harry Potter’s special effects and make up was much better.
6. Harry Potter’s plot was way, WAY better than Twilight. Life isn’t all about your boyfriend, you know?
7. No one cares about looks! Geez, woman! Not everything is about how you look! And don’t get me started on how many better looking characters there are. For example, Ron, Neville (6th movie onwards) Harry, Draco, Snape’s voice, Hermione, Luna, all of the characters because everyone is beautiful in their own way. Yes, even old Voldy! Hmm, maybe not.
Good looking characters: Snape´s voice. 😀 great. Alan Rickman IS sexy. 😛 and voldemort too. 😀
I TOTALLY AGREE!!
AGREE!!!!!!! ONE CANNOT SIMPLY COMPARE HARRY POTTER WITH THE FILTHY TWILIGHT
you have DEFINITELY got to get your brain scanned! Your so called reasons are LAME!
your point one was about appreance, in the book Edward is supposed to look “greek god like” and in the movie he looks like a bleached walking body. Bella aka Kristin Stewart doesnt know the ABC of acting blabbering gibberish all the time. yes the movies are manupilated but NOT ONE Potterhead can be dissapointed with the movies or the books. same cant be said for Twilight.
talking about music?? thats the stupidest reasons any sane person can come up with.
you third reason. REALLY?? they dont change drastically. they Grow up, and appreance changes when you grow. thats a fact and high time you know that simple fact.
Dumbledore had to be changed because the man who protrayed the character died. its impossible to find a twin like him.
twilight is meaning full? made me laugh! its only crap! Important stuffs?? really? just going kissing around is meaningful? and look at what kind of message it gives. give up everything for love(only if it is greek god like person), be completely selfish, retarded, dont enjoy life, dont see the bigger things in the world, dont Ever do good. pathetic! Whereas Harry Potter teaches to be a hero, about friendship, about love, about sacrifice, lessons to be held forever in life.
Special effects. i am sure any animation student can do that. dont ever compare the special Effects of any movie with that of twilight.
better plot?????????? INSANTY
i dont think someone so narrow minded can appreciate good work. i am glad you arent a potterhead. it would be a shame if you were one.
next time make sense.
wahahahaha… thats right!!!!!!
The twilight characters are not better looking. Edward looks like he is high all the time, Bella looks like a zombie with flesh and wants to die, … Jacob i cant really complain about, cuz he has a cute puppy face and a nice body.
Your comment made my day
Harry Potter Characters: Emma W. (Hermione Granger) is so beautiful and we get to gradually watch her grow up into the beauty she is and she is full of life in the movies as where bella looks like she can die any day now.
Are you an idiot??
By the way, the soundtrack didn’t introduce you to INDIAN music. Are you trying to say INDY? If you are, you are wrong. TWILIGHT did not introduce you to any Indy music because there was no indy music. God, you need to get a brain.
god you are such an idiot…the reason dumbeldore looks like a different person is because it IS a different person dumbfuck. the original dumbledore DIED
6. Twilight just has a better plot. That is all.
7. And the Twilight characters are better looking too.
Ha.. better plot? J.K. Rowling’s plot is very complicated and unique. While SMeyer’s? Bah, even a fanfiction author could beat her! The plot’s way too shallow for my taste. Barely intriguing…
Better looking? Hah! I’d rather kiss a Wookiee than Failward Sullen!
Well Chewbacca is pretty badass. I’d take him over the douchecanoe that is our “love intrest” (You have no idea how much I need a sarcasm font)
Omg. I just have to say something about that. I don´t know if this sidfe is troll or something. I really can´t make up my mind about that.
1. Dumbledore: As everyone said before: There was adifferent actor after the first two movies because richard DIED. You can´t make him exactly look like him.
2. The thing that the characters in twilight look better. Uhm well at least they don´t have to put a ton of makeup on their face to look normal. Esme and Alice wear make up all the time and Hermione and Ginny hardly wear any.
3. if the films were exactly like the films, as someone said before, one film would last for 20 hours. And if I remember this thing right: The werwolfes int he films have tattoos on their arms. In the book they don´t have one. I read all the books and seen all the films.
4. The dialogues are meaningfull?! Harry talks about dieing for everyone and to find the horcruxes all by his own. Bella talks about how sad she is that Edward left her and does nothing.
I hope this is a troll. God, please!!!!
I´m just so… -.-
Sorry I made some mistakes, I was just so upset… ^^
I am fairly offended right now. My favorite type of music is classical. I am 13 and know others my age with their favorite music as classical. As you state “I mean, who listens to boring classical stuff like that?” I do. So do others. I have many classical songs on my iPod. I think you owe everyone who enjoys classical music (and all Harry Potter fans, including your sister) an apology.
P.S. Tell your sister she’s awesome cause she knows what’s better.
“Indian music”? *giggle* *snort*
Excuse me, the plot is better? J.K. Rowling has an intricate plot for each of her seven books, and still manages to only slowly reveal crucial historical points, ending in a a fantastic conclusion in the 7th. Sure, YOU may not understand the Harry Potter movies, but that’s because if they put everything in from the books, the movies would be 24 hours long. The directors chose to make the movies within the time limits and simply bend the story so the movies wouldn’t suck as much.
Twilight is about the importance of having a dude stalk you.
Harry Potter is about the importance of love of everyone, and conquering your fears.
Also, I read your blog because it’s nice to know not everyone in the world has more intelligence than a loaf of bread.
If you can’t understand sarcasm, excuse me while I go bang my head against the wall.
1. Variation doesn’t have to be a bad thing.
2. You speak from the viewpoint of the average modern 11-year-old fangirl.
3. That just shows what you know; the actor that played Dumbledore DIED after movie 2. So much for respecting the dead.
4. Twilight is about a girl who starts a war over two crushes. Harry Potter is about the something real. Little wonder Twilight is better, right? -.-
6. Again, girl who starts war over two crushes. Again, something real.
7. SUPERFICIAL.
Thank you. This made me laugh.
My only feedback is that this is ultimately ignorant and you should really reread what you have typed.
You are the BEST crap, crackpot and whatnot of the century…. HP themes have no words…. Of course there need not be words to give a message and HP clearly gives it. Just the music tells so many things… And VAMPIRES DO NOT SPARKLE. I really dunno what makes you go crazy about his sparkling and before you speak about HP’s visual effects, watch the movies properly. You know open you eyes and even your brain which has i think a total of 2 or 3 cells. And movies not sticking to books. I agree. But there is so much of info to fit in and they take only main plot in the movies… And have some sense girl Richard Harris died. The original dumbledore for first 2 movies. And about harry’s scar… It is said that it is on forehead not centre of forehead. You are a dimwit….
Two million points from Hufflepuff.
Bella Swan working at a diner.
It had been three years since Bella-can’t-do-anything-for-herself-Swan, got a job at a local diner in the world of literature. Characters from all different books were eating at this particular diner. Simon, from “Lord of the Flies” was munching on a grilled cheese sandwich, Percy Jackson was eating a hamburger, while Vladimir Tod (a REAL vampire was drinking B positive blood). Luna ate a yummy salad with radishes, while Ron and Harry were figuring out what they wanted to eat.
The owner told Bella that she had to be Harry and Ron’s waitress, and she complained very loudly.
Bella: Can’t I serve someone else instead? How about Jacob? *She complained* I don’t want to serve some stupid wizards who wave sticks around!
The owner’s name was Howl, from “Howl’s Moving Castle” and he did not tolerate racism at all.
Howl: Now if you don’t serve those fine gentlemen, then you are fired missy!
Bella: *Whines like a baby, then goes over to take Harry and Ron’s orders*
Bella: Hi… welcome to Storybook Diner, how can I serve you? *she said in a most unpleasant tone*
Harry: Oh, yes, I’d like a cup of chicken noodle soup, a burger, and fries please. *he said nicely*
Ron: I’ll take a turkey sandwich on rye, toasted please. *He said kindly*
Bella: Anything else? *she said in an annoyed tone*
Ron: I’d like a bottle of pumpkin juice for my boyfriend and I. Thanks…
Harry grinned, but then looked a little off when she gave them a nasty look.
Bella: Wait… you two are dating? What you both couldn’t get girls?
Ron: What’s wrong with you? We didn’t say rude things about your sparkling boyfriend, or the pedo-wolf who got kicked out of the diner because he had no shirt on!
Harry: Look, we just want to have a nice meal here. Just please bring us our food…we’ll give you a nice tip, just quit being rude to us!
Katniss and Prim were sitting near Ron and Harry, they looked pretty mad… mad enough to rip Bella’s hair out as she gave them more nasty looks.
Katniss: Don’t worry about her, I think she’s envious that you all were part of a successful book, and you guys are in such a loving relationship with each other.
Prim smiled and nodded.
Harry: Thanks, we really like your kind words.
Howl: Is something the matter?
Harry: Yes, that waitress, Bella Swan. she was quite rude to us, and it would be nice if she could be kinder…
Ron: maybe a little cheerful.
Howl: I’m sorry about her… you know, she’s part of such an awful book.
Harry: Yes, but let’s not judge.
After the apology, Howl went into the kitchen and scolded the biggest setback in feminism, then told her to bring Ron and Harry their food.
Bella obeyed, but went into a back room with the food first. While in the musty place, she pulled out sparkles, from Cullen’s sweat and put it into Harry’s soup. The glitter was dyed the same color as the broth and she then brought the food to Harry and Ron.
Bella: Well, here is your food! *She said in a cheerful, sickly-sweet tone*
Harry: Thank you.
Ron: Yes, thank you.
When Harry smelled the aroma of his meal, his stomach growled; begging for Him to start eating.
The burger was quite delicious… a charred burger that was crunchy in Harry’s teeth and a little burnt tasting, with a little juiciness on his tongue.
Harry: Mmmm… this is a GOOD burger. *He said as he swallowed a some more of his burger* The bun was nice and fluffy, with poppy seeds dotting the top, like seeds on a field.
Ron took a huge bite out of his sandwich, then kissed Harry on the cheek and sipped his pumpkin juice.
Harry: I’m trying the soup, you want some?
Ron: Nah mate, I’m good.
Harry: Okay then, bottoms up.
Harry ate some of his soup and warmth spread throughout him as the soup went down.
The broth was very hot and Harry shivered a little as it hit the bottom of his stomach.
Each spoonful of noodles, chicken, and carrots was heavenly.
Harry: Yum, this stuff is really amazing! *He said as he finished off the rest of his broth*
When he was done with his meal, and giving his fries to Vladimir Tod, Harry drank his pumpkin juice happily.
For 15 minutes, Harry and Ron started to digest their meals before ordering dessert.
Bella came back and asked them if they wanted dessert, as she wore a crooked grin on her face.
Harry: I’ll take some cauldron cakes please.
Ron: I’ll have some of his.
Bella: Coming right up. *she grinned sadisically*
As Bella was getting the dessert ready, Harry started to feel funky. His stomach started churrning horrendously, and he felt kind of hot… he leaned back onto the booth and wiped off small flecks of sweat from his forehead.
Ron: Harry, mate, you okay? *he said worridly*
Harry: I’m okay, maybe I ate a little too fast. *he said through growing waves of nausea*
Ron: If you’re ill, we can go home. It’s totally up to you.
Harry: I’ll be fine… bring the dessert on.
But Harry didn’t feel fine, and his mouth began to water; he could taste the saltiness from the saliva flowing non-stop on his tongue.
Harry: Ugh… my stomach is really bothering me, and I have a real headache. I wonder if the waitress can bring me some medicine…
Bella: How are you two “lovebirds” doing? *she said as she laughed in her throat at the sight of Harry whilst carrying their desserts*
Ron: Um, can you please get my friend here some pills? We won’t need the dessert… *he said with an angry tone at her sarcastic comment*
Harry: Ron… I don’t feel well…
Other book characters felt bad for Harry and offered to call St. Mungos, but Harry declined before vomiting a flood of his lunch onto the booth seat and under the table.
Ron: HARRY, what’s wrong?
Just then, Prim rubbed Harry’s back as he vomited more, and Ron felt his forehead.
Bella then came back and laughed at Harry and his misfortune. His face then turned to her and he then threw up on the floor… the wave of acid missed her feet and she stepped back.
Howl came in because Vlad told him how he saw her poison Harry’s food.
Howl then got angry with her and Bella got startled, then slipped on Harry’s vomit… her hair, backside, and face got covered with the stuff and she screamed.
Percy clapped and looked to see if Harry was allright, then went back to his table, and the whole diner cheered. A bag of the sparkles slipped out of her pocket, and fell onto the pool of sick as Bella got up.
Ron looked in Harry’s soup cup and saw sparkly residue in the bottom of it and looked at the bag.
Harry offered to clean the mess up, but Howl forced Bella to do it by hand after Ron cleaned her up with *scorgify*.
She got on her hands and knees, then scrubbed the puke off the floor, out from under the table, and off the vinyl seat as Harry and Ron left.
Bella was soon fired after that, the diner was aired out, people came back to eat food in a day or two, then Howl gave Harry and Ron free meal coupons by owl and apologized on her behalf.
*Back at the house*
Harry: That was horrible… *he said as he layed down on his and Ron’s bed* So embarrassing…
Ron: Well, at least you got that bitch fired, AND she’ll smell pretty bad for days… *he laughed*
Harry: That’s true… I only wish I hadn’t ruined everyone else’s appetites…
Ron: Meh, they’ll be fine… I mean some people laughed, and were sympathetic. Have a good sleep, mate.
Harry: Thank you Ron… I love you, wanna take the window side? *He said as Ron kissed him lovingly on the forehead* Ron: Sure, love. He got into bed with him, and Harry then fell into a blissful sleep as Ron fell asleep beside him near the window.
you dolt, the actor who played dumbledore for the first two DIED! and the appearances changed because THEY WERE GROWING UP! you don’t look the same as you were when you were 11, do you? and the special effects for twilight are seriously mediocre, especially compared to harry potter.
omg howl 😀 YOU’RE MY NEW BEST FRIEND!!!!
I love love love you ❤
ButIsupportDrarry. X.X
I LOVE YOU. That siriusly (haha get it? siriusly?) needed to be said.
Okay there’s a lot I’d like to change but there was one thing i really wanted ot say, the reason Dumbledore looks different in the res t of the movies s because they got a different man to play him from 3rd to 7th. I t was because the first Dumbledore (portrayed by Richard Harris) died because he had cancer. So they got Michael Gambon to play him. I don’t really want to talk about the rest it sorta bothers me and stuff and yeah…
by the way, it’s INDIE, NOT INDIAN!
First of all, I’m glad you have someone editing your posts – they really were impossible to read before.
Second, I disagree with your points. Not much of a shock really – I don’t think may people like your posts.
Point 1: I would disagree here. Sticking to the books is more than making the character appearances exactly the same as in the books. It is about keeping the plot line the same – keeping events in order, for example. And, for the top of my head, both movies are fairly good at that. I can’t remember any moment where I have thought ‘That scene should have been earlier!’ or ‘That scene was never in the books!’ in either series of film. But it you were to comment on appearences, I would say Twilight is worse than Harry Potter, especially with hair. Shall I list them? Rosalie and Bella should have hair that reaches their waist, not their shoulders, Alice should have a pixie cut, not a bob, Esme’s hair should be curly and caramel, not black, Carlisle’s shouldn’t be slicked back and Jasper looks nothing like what he is meant to. Also, the character’s hair styles cange with every movie, which doesn’t happen in the books. Rosalie, for example, has lighter and straighter hair in Eclipse, which is impossible because her appearance isn’t supposed to change. With Harry Potter, yes, Percy doesn’t wear glasses and Harry’s scar is on the side of his head, but that isn’t exactly a major problem.
Point 2: Really, this point depends on a person’s taste in music. And I’m gald Twilight got you interested in Indie and Rock music, which are good genres, in my opinion. What you have to understand is that sometimes a classical piece works better in a movie than modern music. Harry Potter is based in an ancient castle full of people wearing robes. Having a rock soundtrack wouldn’t work. Sometimes, lyrics aren’t needed – I know rock songs with no lyrics. People like classical music. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean that it is a waster of resources making a CD of it. Lots of people listen to classical – I enjoy it myself, actually. There is no such thing as ‘real music’. And do you have any idea how hard it is to make a classical score? No, you don’t. But I do. I am taking an exam in composition and it is the hardest thing I have ever done. No classical composer would ever make money for ‘a quick buck’. It takes months to write classical music, sometimes even years, and it is all a better quality than most music released in the past twenty years.
Point 3: As I said in point one, the appearences of the Twilight characters do change alot. And they do in Harry potter, but that isn’t a bad thing. The reason that Dumbledore is different is because the origional actor died. On his death bed, he asked the makers of Harry Potter not to replace him, and they honoured his last wish by making Dumbledore different. As for the different hair styles, people change as they grow up. I can assure you that you don’t have the same hairstyle now as you did when you were a kid. Harry Potter is based over seven years – the characters grew up! And hair changes – lots of people find their hair straightens out over time.
Point 4: I disagree. Harry Potter, to me, is much more meaningful than Twilight. Twilight is two people who think that they are in love, Harry Potter is based in a war – the outcome of which is on the shoulders of a teenage boy. In Twilight, they talk about ‘love’. In Harry Potter, they talk about death, the meaing of life, what it is to fight for what you believe is, coming of age and how doing the right thing is not necissary the easiest thing. There is action in both movies, but more in Harry Potter because it is based in a war. Things have to be cut out of movies – they would be over five hours long if everything was exactly the same as in the books. I think the sixth movie was as good as the rest.
Point 5: Yes, the special effects team are awesome in both movies, but I think Harry Potter’s team were better.
Point 6: No, it doesn’t. Twilight is about two people in love. I could have written it better. Harry Potter’s plotline is intricate and detailed. It spans seven years and deals with war, romance, death, right and wrong.
Point 7:No, they are not. I think they all look aweful. But looks aren’t important! It is the person you are, not the face you have which is important.
Thank you for reading.
I just have to say that I give up on reviewing you because everytime I do your points kinda make me sick and I want to throw up, not to mention my brain-cells die more and more. It’s like My Immortal all over again.
Oh, don’t worry, I might come back when I want to voice out my opinions when it gets too far and I can’t take it.
I’m sorry, I just CAN’T stand it – your hate, your opinions that are just hateful and your excessive amount of focusing on people being hot.
I’m a Slytherin at heart. I can be as hard and cruel as I want right now, but I think I should do otherwise.
Farewell, Lizzie. Please, for the love of all that is Holy, please please please remember that, sometimes, silence is golden. You’re popular, as how you said Bella was, but because your grammar and your opinions get loads of people upset and angry.
Think before you write.
Claire.
*sigh* God, stop posting things, I feel like I have to fix all of them, even though I’m quite sure you’re being satirical. I do have to comment that someone fixing the “speling” (clearly they still need to work on that some) does make this much easier on my eyes, thank you. Now, on to the corrections.
1) There will never, ever, ever be a movie that sticks pefectly to the books. The Hunger Games was close, but still not exactly the same. Twilight was no better than Harry Potter, and while I admit that the later movies deviated from the books rather dramatically, if you paid attention to the first one it was very close.
2) Classical melodies can be quite amazing. Not to mention the fact that not all of the soundtracks are only classical melodies! Double Trouble, for example, has vocals as well. And a nice thing about classical music is that you can play it if you play an instrument, for example I’m a pianist and it’s great fun to play the Umbridge song by ear. Finally, I am actually listening to classical (not Harry Potter) music right now. Don’t hate the classical music.
3) Okay, the Dumbledore actor DIED after the first two movies. It’s pretty much impossible to make them look exactly the same, because they are two different people. This would only have taken you a quick google search to figure out. Another thing, the movies take place over the course of seven years. Did you never change your hair style in the past seven years? Did you look exactly the same as you did at age 15 than at age 11? Didn’t think so.
4) I’m not even sure how to respond to this one…
5) Harry Potter Special Effects took, not only CGI and quick fixes with technology, but hours and hours of real work. Did you know that they actually built the entire Minstry of Magic? Not just a corner or two for a set, the entire. thing.
6) See my comment on your other post.
7) Good-looking-ness isn’t really a factor in how good the movie is.
o please you gotta be kidding me bitch seriously? HOW OLD ARE YOU?! your speaking from a POV of an 11 year old! grow up!!
Twilight is not meaningful what does it teach you? have a boyfriend and TRY TO KILL YOURSELF?abandoning family and friends for your gay boyfriend? how to maintain good looks? and one more thing i wish your flu or whatever it is that you hav return and get worse maybe aftr that you will be enlightened 🙂
dear editor:
you missed “better, a comma, and you should know to never start a sentence with “and”.
Oh and in the title “then” is supposed to be “than” you are just slightly less idiotic
1. The Albus Dumbledore from the first and second HP films were different. The first one died.
2. the appearances were almost exact. Oh no! Harry’s scar is half a centimeter off from the exact middle. It’s called imagination, plus I don’t think Voldemort was aiming exactly in the middle of Harry’s forehead at the time. But J.K. Rowling couldn’t right out the exact measurements because that’s absurd.
3. Vampires don’t sparkle. I’m sorry but Stephanie Meyer just needed a quick fix to her story to make her characters less dark so she added that in. They burn. Just watch Buffy or any old vamp flic and you’ll see. Even though JK Rowling of course added fictional parts to accommodate her story, they were necessary. Sparkling vamps so aren’t.
4. How are the HP books and movies not meaningful? There’s struggle and strife, being hunted down by your corrupt government for the good you’ve done, The romantic struggle between Ron and Hermione, the friendship triangle that can snap at any moment because of the pressure the 3 are under, and the fact the Harry must be more powerful in order to be perhaps the most fearful and maybe even powerful dark wizard of all time. Not to mention the grief Harry goes through as his Uncle’s dog, becoming an orphan at only age 1. How can that not be meaningful?
5. Harry Potter has the music it has because it is a billion dollar bestseller most people of most demographic watch, not some teenage girl garb with hunky werewolves. Just sayin’. It’s better than that. The only music good enough for HP is classical. And for the record, there are some songs in HP4 that are great to listen to, if you actually paid attention that is.
6. This was entirely biased. Obviously most girls would favor Twilight simply because… Well I don’t actually know why. Bella in no way proves to be a heroine, just another damsel in distress. Just look at Hermione in comparison. When she and Ron break up, she goes on living. She doesn’t attempt suicide just to hear Ron’s voice. She’s much better than that. She’s a real woman; she has some actual purpose to the world beyond having sex with some hot vampire. I liked Twilight but even fans have to agree Bella needs to get over herself. She’s in high school and all she can think about is this vampire. Attempting suicide over a boy (not to sound insensitive) is the worst reason of all to do it in the first place.
7. If the HP movies stuck straight to the book, there would be 5-7 hours movies to watch. There are far too many subplots in HP5 to be wrapped up in 3 hours and certainly not enough time to wrap up HP6. Twilight is just a story of Bella getting over her boy troubles. Not much of a book there.
8. Twilight’s plot in 4 points:
1) New girl Bella Falls in love with vampire Edward. Edward becomes a major pedophile, then Bella almost dies.
2) School prom. woo-pee-doo
3)Bella’s B-day, breaks up with Edward. She starts hanging with Jacob and commits suicide a lot. Riveting indeed.
4) Jacob loves Bella. Edward tries suicide but Bella stops him. They marry. She gets pregnant. Bella’s a vamp now. Vultari threats. Battle. Happily ever after.
9. HP had Edward Cullen first. Ever heard of Cedric? God, why did he have to do Twilight afterwards? He isn’t even American.
10. You are so superficial. Basing a film’s worth by the number of 6-packs you see is what’s wrong with people today. Ever heard the phrase “It’s what’s on the inside that matters?” Also, how are Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman, and, of course Tom Felton less handsome? Just because they don’t flaunt their asses and pecs around like it’s an orgy doesn’t mean they aren;t hotties. They’re just decent acting hotties, not sluts. Also, Helena Bonham Carter, Emma Watson, Bonnie Wright, Jessie Cave, and Natalia Tena are so hot (also, they can make actual facial expressions, Bella can only grimace or make a really small unappealing grin. What amazing acting that is. . .) Only a true moron needs hot boy pecs and bad acting for a movie to be 5 stars.
11. If Twilight was that good, why did they break up Breaking Dawn and leave hardly anything for Part 2? HP7 was reasonably split in two, otherwise the movie would suck. Twilight producers just wanted more money.
12. Harry Potter is the highest selling movie series in history. Literally, no series has ever reached the billion gained by HP, and Twilight is done for as it’s almost done and not near HP’s revenue.
Also, if Twilight was so great, why would so many people be hating on this post? Twilight is for superficial, obviously low-standered teen girls who just want a story about some mellow-dramatic teen girl who can’t get over a boy. No boy is ever worth your own life. Ever.
I am one of those imaginary persons who listens to classical music. In fact, I am a classically trained musician. Your idea that a composer would simply be trying to make a quick buck as opposed to a musical technician working on a film who simply sits in a room all day listening to other people’s music and deciding whether they fit, is appalling. While musical analysts and producers also work extremely hard, composers slave over the music they write and musicians pour every ounce of themselves into their work. Musicians and conposers are also paid very little. So there isn’t much to earn from a “quick buck” for them. And on top of that, twilight also has a score of classical music written by a composer that also works extremely hard. You just insulted that man or woman too. At least state that you prefer music with lyrics and move on, but don’t say that classical music is at all inferior to other types of music, do not question the artistic integrity of people who you don’t know at all, and do not insult fans of a certain type of music. I’m really not trying to be mean.. There’s enough of that on here already. But seriously, it’s one thing to state your opinion. It’s an entirely separate thing to go out your way to insult people and make them feel bad. And right now, I’m very upset by these comments about the music. I couldn’t really care less that you have an opinion about harry potter v. twilight. You are completely entitled to your opinion. However there is a right and a wrong way to go about such things and this was the wrong way.
What about Victoria? She doesn’t look the same in the last movie she’s in…oh…wait…that’s right. The Actor changed! Whoa! What do you know?! Crazy. Oh! And I do believe that in the books, Bells has facial expressions. Does Bella in the movies? Answer: no.
They don’t have up-to-date music because they’re in a freaking castle. Obviously, they’re not going to be blasting some random ghetto music in the halls of a castle. Point proven.
Obviously, Twilight has better affects. Making those werewolves look like giant cats. Yep, if that’s what they were going for, they sure did succeed in that! For sure!
Twilight Plotline: Girl falls in love with vampire who wants to kill her. Best friends with werewolf. Vampire gets over it. Werewolf gets over it. Vampire and girl get married. Have child. Turns girl into vampire. Werewolf imprints with baby. And everyone lived happily ever after! The end!
Moral of the story: Get a boyfriend and do what you can to keep him. Even torturing your bestfriend.
How it came to be: Stephenie Meyers’ sexual fantasy.
What Robert Pattinson (your “sexy” vampire) thinks of it: Hates it with a burning passion.
Inspired me to: Read another book. Like any other book inspires me to do.
Number of books: 4 1/2
I could write a better story of the same plotline in 1 book.
J.K. Rowling can write a better love story in a chapter.
Harry Potter Plotline: Boy kills most feared wizard of all time when baby. Doesn’t know he, too, is wizard. Parents die. Lives under stairs in aunt and uncle’s house. Discovers is wizard. Becomes friends with pure wizard and muggle-born witch. Teacher hates him. Becomes Seeker. Powerful wizard comes back multiple times during the series. Boy kills him (to put it simply for the simpleminded ones) each time. Eventually falls in love with best friends sister. Bestfriends fall in love with each other. Almost everyone he loves dies for him or someone else. Goes looking for parts of evil wizard’s soul so that he may be beat once and for all. Has difficulty finding them. Eventually finds them and destroys them. Goes back to school inorder to kill evil wizard. More people that he loves and cares about die. Has to die himself inorder to save everyone. Kills evil wizard. Barely anyone lived happily ever after. The end.
Moral of the story: Sometimes, people that you care about dies. Not everyone gets out alive. Sometimes people that you don’t expect to die…well…die. So care about what you have and treat them the best you can. If they’re your friends and you have the emotional range of a teaspoon or even if they’re your enemy. YOLO, if you will, which it sounds like you do. You only live once. Don’t waste it. Don’t do a bunch of stupid crap. Fight for what you believe in. Fight for what’s right. There’s so many more, but I don’t think you would understand them. Don’t be racist or make fun of anyone, or any other crap because that person may be smarter than you and probably is.
How it came to be: Based off of J.K. Rowlings life. Every character was based off of someone that she knew. None of it was a fantasy.
What Robert Pattinson (your “sexy” vampire) thinks of it: He loves it so much!
Inspired me and many other to: Read the series over and follow my dreams.
Number of books: 7, plus a few spin-offs, plus the actual books that they use in the movies.
I could write a better story of the same plotline in…wait…I could never. J.K. Rowling is our queen.
Stephenie Meyers could write a better love story in…nope…just kidding. She could never.
Learn grammer and spelling before doing anything else because that really doesn’t help what we think of you. 😀
Oh! #6 you had already stated. So you only have 6 reasons why…which opposed to the thousands for us, you really have no clue what you’re talking about. Oh, and my favorite part of this whole thing, you just insulted your own “sexy” vampire in #7. He was in Harry Potter first. So whatever. Grow up. Learn to spell. Learn some grammer.
Not sure if troll or just really stupid… NO, I’M SERIOUS. I’ve never encountered such an invalid argument in my life. I actually got legitimately upset when she said the thing about Dumbledore looking different because I still remember WHEN HE DIED. I cried like a bitch. This entire blog thing makes me weep for humanity.
1. Would you liked to know why things change from the movies to the books? In Harry Potter, there is so much detail that they have to figure out ways to fit in as much as they can, therefore they must change it around. In the Harry Potter books it does not say “And he had a lightning shaped scar right in the smack middle of his forehead.”
2. Newsflash honey, they don’t put music in the movies for you to have a nice time stomping and clapping around and enjoy the music. Music is put in the movies to enhance the mood. In twilight, the music is trying to make it dramatic. If Bella was looking out her car window, they started playing some dramatic slow song to make you feel like you should be looking out that window too. The music in Harry Potter always just sets the mood, and makes the movie better. It’s much easier to think about what’s going on in the movie when the movie isn’t screaming “SUPER MASSIVE BLACK HOLE SCREAM SCREAM RAAH RAAHH HISS HISS” in my face. The Harry Potter soundtrack is not people trying to “Make a quick buck.” Those songs were written for Harry Potter. Not just downloaded off iTines and inserted into the movie.
3. You are a complete dumbass. The actor who played Dumbledore in the first two movie DIED. He changed his hair, but so what? I change my hair all the time! I change my style in clothes too! Is Dumbledore not allowed to change because it confuses you or something? They can’t make him look the same, HE’S A DIFFERENT PERSON. Do you want them to give him an entire wax face mask? They had no choice. They didn’t kill the first actor, he died. So they did what they had to do. Again, with Malfoy, people change their hair ALL THE TIME. Hermione’s hair stopped being frizzy..so? Maybe she started doing something different! If I get out of the shower and brush my hair, it dries frizzy. If I wait to brush it until it dries, it’s normal. Hair is not a drastic change, unless you’re just too damn stupid to follow along.
4. Oh yes Twilight has the most important dialogue of them all “Edward please don’t leave me.” “I have to.” “No please don’t leave me!” “I have to.” “No Edward please don’t leave me.” It gets old. Every word of Harry Potter is important. The words are probably just too big for you.
5. Yeah the twilight special effects team did a wonderful job making all those trees! They looked so real! It looked there was like..a whole forest there or something! Now that I’m done being sarcastic, I’ll let you know that Harry Potter has some of the best special effects I’ve ever seen in my life. Over half of the things on screen, aren’t really there. They did a wonderful job.
6. So back to being sarcastic, yeah I thought it was great how Bella was such a needy, boyfriend obsessed idiot! The plot was just wonderful. All that running in the forest. All those suicide attempts. What a lovely movie. Yeah..no. Don’t even go there. I’m just wondering if you’re ever going to have a valid argument.
7. Haha. Nice to see you can be sarcastic too. Because they all look constipated.
Dissing Twilight LIKE A BOSS
I seriously want to meet you… To see if you actually are this stupid and shallow in real life or if you’re just a troll.
Your blog is bad and you should feel bad. This site is a waste of bandwidth.
Although… can’t tell if really stupid Twifag or really good troll.
No idea if anyone has said this, but you mentioned that your sister is a big fan of Harry Potter. Well then your sister is a better human being than you.
Are you insane or something? Were you bitten by the sparkling creepy blood-sucking fairy?
I I really hope you are a troll, or I might just go live on mars.
-rubs temples- Time to start preaching to the ignorant
Look sweetie to number 7. no Infact I would take ANYONE over the douche canoes and sparkle pussies In twilight ANYONE i dare you Give me name bitch!
The Dumbledore in the first to movies looks different because he died and was replaced by another actor.
Keep your opinions to yourself, that way people won’t hate you.
Twilight has a better plot than Harry Potter? Twilight is 4 books all talking about one desperate teenage girl who has to choose between a werewolf who could probably eat her face and a dead pedophile. Edward Cullen is a dead pedophile who stalks younger girls and watches them sleep. Isn’t he adorable? Bella chooses the dead pedophile. Jacob imprints on her daughter. Which is wrong on so many levels. And which also means, he’s a pedophile. like, Dafuq is up with this story? Harry Potter, on the other hand, is about bravery, friendship, loyalty, overcoming fears, love, and that good triumphs over evil. Twilight has more important dialogues than harry potter? Everything from the first harry potter book is relevant and interconnected to the plot till the last book. Bella’s dialogues, on the other hand, always involves Edward’s god-like looks. Also, NONE of your points are legit. You’re only comparing the character’s appearances. Which is shallow, might i add. Twilight characters aren’t better looking to be honest. When it comes to facial expressions, Kristen can’t act to save her life. Robert looks like he has a broom up his arse. Just saying.
So, my dear muggle, who probably wouldn’t know a good book if it hit you in the face, i have three words for you.
AVADA KEDAVARA, BIATCH.
Also, did i mention? Edward Cullen is a dead pedophile.
kbye.
1. You’re making too big a deal out of the appearances. Seriously, you’re acting like Harry Potter was a chick with hot pink hair. The reason there weren’t as many changes in Twilight’s plot was because there wasn’t as much plot to change. Also, I personally like it when a few things are changed, if the main plot isn’t messed up. It isn’t in Harry Potter. I’ll admit that the last part is a matter of opinion, but still, this aspect of the movies is fine.
2. Who listens to ‘boring classical stuff’ like that, you ask? I do. I also listen to rock bands. Also, it seems like you think ‘Classical’ and ‘No Lyrics’ are the same thing. I’m sorry if that’s just my misinterpretation, and this sentence doesn’t apply to you if it is, but I have a rock band on my iPod and there is not a SINGLE word in one of their songs. Classical music is real too.
3. They couldn’t make the Dumbledores look the same because the new one was neither his twin nor his clone. Malfoy and Hermione might have decided to change their hairdos. It’s clear that going from Frizzy to Waves is possible, since she does it in the book. The book never mentions it because it’s not all physical descriptions and ‘love’.
4. The closest the Twilight movies can come to meaningfulness is if they’re supposed to be an example of what NOT to do, and since you think the main characters look good, obviously you’d never even consider they might have flaws, because you’re one of those idiots that think looks are everything.
5. I’ll just skip this since you seem to be somewhat on Harry Potter’s side here.
6. How does Twilight have a better plot???
7. That’s a matter of opinion and a stupid argument.
Jingle Bells, Twilight Smells, Edward Ran Away, Bella Died, Jacob cried, HARRY POTTER ALL THE WAY!!!!
And BTW your “opinions” and “reasons” have no meaning at all.
Sincerely,
me
There are a billion and one reasons why all of this is complete shit, and I could probably argue with you for days over this (if youd even last that long, probably not) but honestly, right now I really have no words for you. It is that bad. You have got to be fucking kidding me, you cant actually be sirius right? I mean, how stupid can you get?
1. Harry Potter sticks to the books fine. What’s cut out is usually because of time constraints. That’s just how film works. And for the record, the Twilight books are all filler until the ‘plot’ rears it’s bored head in the final three chapters. Harry Potter is exciting the whole way through. All the actors fit the casting and there’s no issue with how they look. Who cares if Percy Weasley doesn’t wear glasses? Bella’s vampire scar is meant to be on the back of her hand and in the movie it’s on her wrist. Does anyone honestly care? JK Rowling was heavily involved the whole time and even though the movies could never be as good as the books, they’re still great and I always enjoy watching them. Twilight just either puts me into hysterical laughter at how awful it is or sends me to sleep with its incomparible dullness.
2. Nobody’s ever going to remember the Twilight theme (did it even have one?) whereas anyone could recognise Hedwig’s theme since it sounds magical. Even Bella’s Lullaby didn’d sound right. It was a total waste of time. The Harry Potter music is memorable and fits the world better. Twilight’s is just dull emo sounds.
3. *Sigh* The original Dumbledore, Richard Harris, sadly passed away after the second movie and the new actor Michael Gambon had a similar yet unique look. How could he look the same? It’s a different actor! I thought he looked pretty good. Who honestly gives a damn about Malfoy’s hair? The actors and characters grow up, why shouldn’t their hairstyles? Hermione’s hair is obviously going to change as Emma Watson grew up. Appearances subtly change, that’s realistic. Also, NOBODY BUT YOU CARES!
4. Twilight’s dialogue is less interesting than a soap opera. All they talk about is “I’m so tortured by my love for you!” “I would rather die than be away from you” “Oh you sparkle, you’re the light of my life”
The Half Blood Prince was an enjoyable movie made from an incredibly rich, detailed plot. Of course there’s going to be changes, we expect that. Do you seriously think they’re going to add every single solitary thing from each book? HELLO!
5. Harry Potter towers above Twilight in everything, but also in special effects. The vampire sparkling was laughable, you could hardly see it in the movie.
6. Twilight is about obsession, the importance of having a boyfriend and being pretty. Harry Potter is about finding strength in yourself, fighting for good in the face of evil and the power of love and friendship. Set in a magical world.
7. For the millionth time, there is far more to life than being pretty. And I only personally found a select few of the Twilight actors even remotely attractive. Mostly without their vampire makeup. And it wasn’t Pattinson. Or Stewart. Or Lautner.
I listen to the Harry Potter music. People grow as a person when you are filming people when they are 11 to 17 in the books. The person that played Dumbledore DIED. The books and movies are very close. There are some things you can’t put in a movie. The Harry Potter music is classical music and it takes a lot of skill to play it. You can focus on the movie if there isn’t lyrics.
Can I use Avada Kedavra on you? Please? Or at least Cruciatus curse?
While I respect the fact that we all have different opinions, zero of your “reasons” of why the Twilight movies are better than the Harry Potter movies even make logical sense.
For one thing, your first, third, and seventh points all tie in together. First of all, appearance shouldn’t matter to you, and you’re making yourself sound semi-shallow by going on and on and on and on about this and that. As for Dumbledore–well, the first actor died. As for Hermione, she kind of . . . y’know . . . got some years older, didn’t she? These things happen. Biology happens. It’s not otherworldly.
And the Harry Potter movies don’t stick to the books? Yes they do. Oh, don’t get me wrong–the Twilight movies do, too. But the REASON that the Potter movies don’t have every little detail that the books do is because they books are books, and they are quite long, filled with near-breathing characters . . . which Twilight cannot say it has.
Besides–Robert was apart of the Potter cast FIRST. And I don’t remember ANYWHERE in the books saying that Edward is a constipated vampire.
And anyway, it’s YOUR opinion of who’s “hot” and who isn’t. First, third, and seventh points are–as I said–invalid.
“The Twilight movies have better music?” Once again, that’s nothing more than an opinion, not a solid fact that anyone can actually prove. Besides, I don’t see how any of the music actually REALLY ties in with the plot–whereas you can tell when the music is getting darker or lighter in Harry Potter.
Awesome dialogue? Like, “Ooh, baby, I love you so much?” That’s not awesome, that’s kindergarten level vocabulary. And, once again, you’re only speaking of your own opinion.
As for the plot, well, I don’t see how it’s better. Once again, it is nothing more than a matter of opinion.
1.Uh, pretty sure that Twilight doesn’t have Indian music in it.
2. I don’t think the composers would see their work as “making a quick buck”. Classical music is actually really intense on so many levels.
3. The characters change because the actors change.
4. Do you look exactly the same as you did 4 or so years ago?
5. I’ll admit that Twilight have some good points, but why should you be so quick to judge? The HP BOOKS actually are teaching the youth of today to stand up to their enemy.
6. Harry Potter is more realistic than Edward Cullen. For one, do you actually know a guy that glitters in the sunlight?
7. You really need to pay attention in school.
8. You’re an idiot.
@LIZZIEBELLA Your arguments are completely invalid you dipshit. Do reseach before trying to compare two completely different storylines. eople like you make me not want to live on this planet anymore.
Indian music… correct me if im wrong but doesn’t the term “indie” stem from the word independant? And “real music” really comes down to the opinion of the listener.. im not a huge hp fan but I can appreciate a good movie score and harry potters soundtrack completely compliments the films. Id rather sit down and watch all harry potter films back to back than watch one twilight movie. At least harry potter has depth.
Hello, I recently found your blog while I was “surfing the web”. I hate to say that you seriously insulted me. I am a Harry Potter fan. Don’t start thinking that I am being bias. I have read all of the Twilight Saga, it was decent. I actually preferred Twilight for a short time before I finished the series.
Why I am writing is concerning the fact of some of the things you’ve posted online before about Harry Potter. I would like you to take it down, it is utterly disgusting that someone would post something like that. You say that you’ve watched the Harry Potter movies and that you think that Twilight did a better job. Have you read the books?
I must say that, and I think everyone will agree with me, Harry Potter movies didn’t keep true to the story in certain ways. They left out Peeves, Teddy (Remus and Tonk’s son), etc. But, what you brought up, Percy Weasley isn’t described to wear glasses. The American artist depicts him with glasses out of their imagination. Harry’s scar is towards the middle of his forehead. I would like you to say where in the book it is stated to be exactly in the middle of his forehead.
Oh, this is going to be fun, let’s move on to where Twilight has its inaccurate moments. Let’s start with a sad vampire named Jasper. Jasper is described with brown hair, semi long, considering that he was born in the 1800’s. In Eclipse does the actor not have blondish hair? Isabella Swan is described to have longer hair and layered chocolate brown eyes, Kristen Stewart’s eyes look black throughout the entire film. Oh, and Laurent is described with olive skin.
Yes, a great point in music. Who listens to classical? Hm… Well, I do. Hedwig’s Theme is one of my favourites. Yes, the music in Twilight is very techno and has words, I suppose that is because the characters don’t show any emotion and words are needed to show their thoughts. Do you know who wrote the music for the first three Harry Potter films? John Williams, known for the Star Wars saga, Jaws, Superman, the Indiana Jones films, Home Alone and Jurassic Park. I think people like his music just fine.
I think this is the hardest to write for, I don’t want to insult you. And I think I might end up anyway. Do you know where Harry Potter takes place? In Hogwarts. Hogwarts is a school and each book is another year of school, sometimes expanding into summer a bit. All the characters are alive, and therefore they age. Tell me that you have never gotten your hair cut or started parting your hair differently.
Let’s start with Draco Malfoy. Draco is the son of Lucius and Narcissa Malfoy. Narcissa’s sister, Bellatrix, is a Death Eater (One of Voldemort’s followers). Lucius was a Death Eater and so was Narcissa. His family is a pure blood, rich wizard family. He was only eleven and already gelling his hair back to look more proper as a younger child. He later let it down partly to show his growing up and a bit of rebellion. Gelling it back up was a way to show that his family was restricting him, which it was. He was expected to follow Voldemort and kill Dumbledore.
Hermione is a girl, one thing about girls is that we over think things (At least I do, you probably don’t) and girls are pretty sensitive. If you read the books you would know that Hermione was picked on a lot by many people. Maybe it was her way of being “pretty” by straightening her hair some. The first man playing Dumbledore died, how senseless can you be? The second Dumbledore did just as well. Dumbledore had been going through a lot in his life and towards the end of it he was already nearing death.
I will again bring up how your sparkly vampires had changes in hair. Does Meyer not state that her vampires cannot change appearance and that tattoos, hair-dye, etc. will not hold?
Not meaningful? Oh, this might not sound professional, but then again, I’m not a professional. But, are you an idiot? Harry Potter deals with subjects that your humdrum of a book will never understand. J.K Rowling uses examples of homophobia, confronting fears, class rights, bullying, finding yourself, being yourself, evil, love, death, and in the end friendship.
Personally, I think that some foolish twat attempting suicide after her boyfriend leaves, then leaving the country, and getting pregnant at a young age isn’t the best example to give to a teenager.
Better looking cast? You are so shallow. I love how Remus Lupin looks like a man who goes through painful transformations- at least he wears a shirt. Sirius Black looks like a man who has lost everything- Edward Cullen just sparkles. Harry Potter has painful memories that come with his scar- not just a crescent bite. Voldemort looks like a person who has attempted to live forever- your vampires are going to high school for fun?
I love the points you made, but she’s sort of right about the whole “Percy wears glasses” things. J. K. Rowling writes about his “horn-rimmed glasses” occasionally, though I’m not sure whether or not they’re only reading glasses. If they ARE only reading glasses, then that would give us a solid excuse of why we never see the glasses in the movies: because he’s never reading.
As for Harry’s scar being in the middle of his forehead, well, she got that from the American illustrator for the books (not sure where the scar is put on the Bloomsbury editions).
i live in whitby, england we have had a dracula created here as well as vampires created here (search whitby vampire book on google images). We also have vampire weekends do we see any sparkes there? no the only sparkles we see are on the 5th of november
I’m sorry… But I am FED UP of people dissing on Harry Potter. This is a Twilight page, so stick to your fandom and leave Potterheads alone! This is the reason why I went off Twilight…. because of the fans ridiculed me for also liking Harry Potter. While the Harry Potter fans were fine with me liking Twilight so yeah.
Harry Potter has been a part of my life since 1997, so as soon as someone disses it I will stick up for it.
I’m sorry but I could not bite my tongue any longer. I’ve had enough of people dissing Harry Potter on a Twilight website. Stick to your own series and we’ll stick to ours.
okay
1. No it doesn’t. I have read the books, Twilight and Harry Potter and the films stick to the books just as much as Harry Potter. When I read Twilight and watched the film, I though to myself that there was bits that they did miss out. And yes, Harry Potter does this too, I’m not going to pretend that it doesn’t. But for both films there is a reason. It’s not possible for them to fit everything in, otherwise each book would go into three to five parts, leading people to become bored, and the actors to become to old to play their parts. Also, Edward was no where near what I thought he would look like, and lots of other people believed this too (remember the petition?) The Harry Potter actors where exactly what I imagined the characters. Except of course Harry’s eyes. (Daniel Radcliffe was allergic to contact lenses) and Percy’s glasses.
2. First of all I think do you mean you like Indian, or indie music? Also, I like classical music, and in the later movies a composer called Alexandre Desplate composed the music for it, and this man also composed the music for Twilight. So to say that the music in Harry Potter isn’t good, your sort of saying that to Twilight. Also there are people like me, who like to just listen to the music without any talking like they do in the movies.
3. The Twilight movies are set over a short amount of time and the characters are already fully grown, so their appearances would not have changed. Dumbledore looks like a completely different person, because he is a completely different person, the actor died (R.I.P) You cannot make someone look exactly the same, unfortunately we have not perfected the art of cloning. Also Draco and Hermione changed because they GOT OLDER. People change, and they are supposed to be teenagers. Their looks never stay the same for long.
4.Harry Potter is only about all the action if you think it is, in other words, your probably not understanding the story and are only taking notice of the action as a result. (I’m not trying to be mean). Once you take notice of the story you will understand how meaningful it is. (Honestly Harry Potter has saved my life, because of the messages). There other things that are important other than love. Love is the most important thing, but so is friendship and family and bravery, and multiple other things. Twilight only goes over love, when there are so many other things. Also like I said before they cannot fit everything in the movies.
5. I agree with you on that one, they do both use good special effects, but the sparkly thing, was not what I was expecting. Hagrid technically wasn’t a Special Effect, they used another guy who was tall and he wore stilts. Hogwarts was an actual set too.
6. No. Sorry, Harry Potter really makes you think, and then you have to go back and realize all of he things that you missed out before. Twilight is more or less just a love story, and really simple to follow.
7. Not really. And also you cannot judge something based on looks, that’s really vain. Harry Potter teaches us that. Just look at Hermione! She just goes to show that brains are more important.
Please leave Harry Potter alone, and stick to your own fandom. It just gets annoying.
Here’s where you are so terribly wrong, in the order of your points:
1. The Harry Potter books do stick very accurately to the books. They have to make cuts, because the time constraints. Nobody would want to sit there for four hours watching a Harry Potter movie (well, I would, but I’m not most people). Also, Percy’s glasses weren’t constantly mentioned in the books, so it wasn’t as important. And, I’m not sure the book ever said a specific location to where Harry’s scar is exactly supposed to be. Besides, they had better make-up artists than Twilight did. Everyone looked like they were rolling in flour, and Peter Facinelli looked like a Ken doll (although, I do love him.)
2. What’s so wrong with classical music? I happen to find it relaxing, and I often sit down and write my novel to it, or do my homework to it. It’s a great source of relaxation. It’s not a waste of money. I have music from the Harry Potter soundtracks, and it’s gorgeously written. The guy who wrote the music for most of the films wrote it for Star Wars as well, plus so many more movies. He did a fantastic job, and wasn’t looking to make a quick buck. You’ll find composers like him do it because they love it.
3. Dumbledore looks completely different after the first two movies, because the original Dumbledore died. So, yes, it was a completely different person. Also, makeup changes, especially with the director changes, so everyone’s going to look a bit different. Also, they made Hermione’s hair was really frizzy, but they were trying to make it manageable for poor Emma Watson to wear. Didn’t Edward’s hair go from like a bit long (not like shoulder length, obviously, but longer than some guys wear it) to super short?
4. Twilight isn’t meaningful, except on how to look like a desperate weirdo. Action is okay, but there are so many moments of just…pure bonding in Harry Potter. And moments where you know that Harry’s coming closer to his end with Voldemort. Twilight they’re all like “…And then he sparkled.” Carlisle is the only one who seems to have a clue (although, Alice is freaking awesome, Emmet is hilarious, and Esme is really sweet.)
5. Harry Potter’s special effects trump Twilight’s any day. And, Hagrid really is 8’6”. They use tall shoes, and higher platforms to get him that high. And the Great Hall is based out of a college, I think they said.
6. Twilight does not have a better plot. Harry Potter is all about bravery, and keeping friends close, and love, and staying strong in the face of adversary. Twilight’s all about a weirdo who’s a blood squeamish, and yet wants to become a vampire…. I’m still not sure how that works out.
7. Emma Watson is gorgeous. And Tom Felton is sexy. Most of Twilight’s characters aren’t that good looking. Granted, Peter Facinelli is super hot, as is the dude who plays Emmet. After that, no.
While Twilight in general is not a horrible book and the movies were well filmed and directed but they are not for the younger age, in the beginning it started with Bella in a depression and then her obsession with Edward. The next book is her trying to hurt herself to “see” Edward instead of doing something productive. He also starts another love story that is doomed to fail. The themes get even more mature. They talk about sex, and fighting, it is very violent. IN the lost one they have sex, a violent birth and then Jacob falling in love with a child. Which can send the wrong message to children, if an older man loves you and can’t live without you, it’s ok cause he will wait.
Harry Potter is not the perfect character but he grows, the books were written so the audience would grow up with the book and can relate with the struggles he faces. In a book there is supposed to be an opposition to the main character, throughout the Potter series it was Voldemort and than characters came in who supported him and tried to get rid of Harry, while the Twilight series has a different struggle for ever book, James, than his girlfriend and the army of new born’s and than all the other “bad” vampires who wanted to get rid of Bella.
The character names in twilight don’t mean anything, while the Potter names do, it was to express some desired trate in them. Although Harry didn’t mean anything it was not supposed to, it was supposed to be a normal name because harry was a normal boy in the non-magical world.
The music in a movie is not to pull focus from the characters and what they are doing, it made sense in the twilight movies to use bands and music with words in them because it explained how the character was feeling. It was based this modern time where people would have a mp3 to listen to. The harry potter books took place in a world where modern day technology didn’t touch them, also the characters never had time to listen to music.
In Harry Potter the characters were not supposed to be “hot” they were growing up, which meant awkward teen years and little kid habits, like fizzy hair and a different way of talking. Hermione was not a pretty girl, she was the smart one and focused on school not appearance.
Even Robert Patterson was in both movies, he ended up dead in both. When asked what he would think of twilight is he wasn’t in it he said he would mindlessly hate it.
When it comes down to plot there is no guessing what is going to happen, you know they will be together and it will be a happily-ever after story, There wasn’t a challenge to over come just waiting around, Harry Potter started with a huge challenge and it explained how he grew to overcome it.
In nut shell
Twilight- A story of a girl who falls in love and can’t live without him.
Harry Potter- The story of a boys life fighting to beat his enemy.
Tags: ale, amazing, awesome, bella, better, blog, book, dumbledore, edward, emmett, epic, fail, flu, for the win, ginger, harry, harry potter, hermione, lizzibella, lizzie, movies, peace, puke, ron, ron weasley, ronald, suck, sucks, swan, than, twilight, twilight rocks, voldemort, weasley
Seriously?
LizzieBella and Peace, “You’re a fucking butt trumpet” quote from Sour Grape Snape btw. How can you say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter?!?! Like bitch -_- Is there a proper awesome musical about Twishit? NO! Like What The Fuck cunt. You’re the biggest idiot of the millennium… Thinking that Twilight special effects are cool? Like when you see the people in Twishit turn into were wolves you see the jumping into a bush and tada they’re a wolf …. But when you see Remus Lupin turn into a wolf you hear all the pain and see all the intricate details of of the were wolf right? Just so you know Hagrid (who is played by Robbie Coltrane) is naturally tall and stared in 2 James Bond movies. Your comment on how supposedly the actors in Twishit look better than the actors in Harry Potter is just wrong. We watched all the characters grow up and from my point of view Emma Watson is beautiful full stop! Compared to Kirsten Stewart, Emma is a goddess of hotness-ness. Kirsten Stewart wears the same expression through out the entire series like ew! Edward is a pale sparkly freak but Robert Pattinson even he’s only in it for the money but if he wasn’t he would mindlessly hate it. Suck it bitch -_- Twishit doesn’t have a better plot than Harry Potter and here are my reasons:
1. If you take away the love triangle from Twishit it is just about a girl in a rainy town where it rains and if you take love away from Harry Potter its about a boy who becomes a wizard and defeats Voldermort who is an evil resurrected being who is in capable of love.
2. Bella is a dumb cunt who gets pregnant at 18! Isn’t she a good role model for all those stupid sluts, while all the Harry Potter cast are all decent like Hermione for example, she overcame all the obstacles of being a mudblood and became witch of her age =D
3. and JKR is like the world’s greatest writer. She started out writing the first Harry Potter book on a napkin =p
4. You are way too conceded.
I can like go on and on about it but your tiny little squib minds can handle it and I’m be Sirus :3
The ONLY reason why Dumbledore was so different in Chamber of Secrets from Prisoner of Azkaban is because the Original Actor who played Dumbledore DIED.
It is IMPOSSIBLE for Twilight to have a better plot because Edward is an Abusive Stalker, Bella blames her self and is whiny emo loser, there are multiple plot holes, and there is so much detail cupcake crap that the book doesn’t even have a real plot!
Also, ever heard of proper grammar?
Oh no . I agree with her on the part for special effects. I mean, Think, How much computer power and manhours it took to turn good actors into cocksucking robots with no expression. I bet harry potter did not have such special effects now,did they?
Rest of the reasons. BITCH PLEASE, get a life and stop sucking your teacher’s dick to pass those high school tests
Um, wtf is this shit? This person has horrible judgement, and hasn’t even read the books.
Harry Potter wins, for Twilight is senseless, irritating and promotes paedophilia, with Edward being over 50-100 years older than Bella, along with the character Jacob Black taking an interest in a mere infant. They also sparkle, which is a huge turn off. The cast of the Harry Potter saga all adore the books, while the cast of Twilight all despise Twilight. The Twilight books now require fancy covers with red pages to attract readers, while Harry Potter’s fame and known popularity attracts people instantly. Harry Potter has sold over 450 million copies, and been translated into 67 different languages, and the final four books consecutively set records as the fastest selling book series of all time and has won many, many awards, while Twilight has only sold 116 million books, and been translated into 38 languages. Twilight basically sends out the message that woman can’t do anything without their boyfriend. So much for Feminism.
Stephen King said, “the real difference between J. K. Rowling and Meyer is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer, and Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a darn. She’s not very good.”
Laura Miller of Salon.com wrote that “the characters, such as they are, are stripped down to a minimum, lacking the texture and idiosyncrasies of actual people”, and said that “Twilight would be a lot more persuasive as an argument that an ‘amazing heart’ counts for more than appearances if it didn’t harp so incessantly on Edward’s superficial splendors.”
L. Lee Butler of Young Adult Library Services Association commented how he was unusually hesitant to stock the Twilight books in his library because he felt the books were “robbing teen girls of agency and normalizing stalking and abusive behavior.”
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: End of an Era
Twilight Breaking Dawn: End of an Error
Harry Potter by far is better than Twilight. It is impossible for me to explain my hatred for Twilight, as it is equally impossible (most likely more) impossible for me to explain my undying love for Harry Potter, which, might I add, is the highest grossing film series of all time. The two main characters in Twilight are just plain irritating, with Edward being just plain creepy ‘I like watching you sleep’ What on Earth? Is he crazy or something? Gosh. For those who say ‘Harry Potter has no romance’ well, what do you call Ron and Hermione, the couple who went through everything together, fought like an old married couple more times than you could imagine, but still got through it and always made up, were friends for life, and eventually got married and had 2 beautiful and sweet children together? What do you call that, hmm? Now, which is more romantic that, or meeting in a science lesson and being stalked? I find it infuriating, but at the same time laughable and pointless for anyone to even try compare Harry Potter to Twilight, It’s a disgrace to the memory of Harry Potter to try to compare it to something as vile and simple-minded as Twilight; Harry Potter is about confronting fears, finding inner strength, and doing what is right in the face of adversity; Twilight, however, is about how important it is to have a boyfriend. Take your pick, but personally I and anyone else with some sense in them choose Harry Potter. I read the first 20 pages of Twilight and was bored sick, I would rather puke, be tortured, anything, you name it, than go through that again, let alone read the entire series, that would be pure torture; and yet, I have read the Harry Potter series about a million times, and I have never gotten bored, not even once, if anything I have just become more in-love with Harry Potter. Harry Potter has sold about 450 million copies and has been translated into 67 languages, and the last four books consecutively set records as the fastest-selling books in history while Twilight has sold only 116 million copies with translations only into 38 different languages, showing that not as many races would like to read Twilight, Twilight was also most donated to the charity store. Why don’t you stick that in your pipe and smoke it. Harry Potter teaches you that even if all hope seems lost, there will always be a small glint of hope in the air, that even if you started off badly, there will always be someone there for you, if you start out small, shy and frail, you can end up strong, tall, fierce and brave (Neville Longbottom) that even in the most evil, good can be found (Draco Malfoy) that even though not everything goes right in your life, it will always be O.K. That even though you may be an insufferable know-it-all, you can end up being loved, adored and idolised by many people around the world ( Hermione Granger). You say Twilight? I say you’re mad.
FUCK YOU! You’re a retarded shit-filled bitch! The music from the Harry Potter movies are AMAZING! They’re one of a kind classical music composed by wonderful and talented people. And also, don’t you know that making a person look exactly like a character is actually hard. The reason why Dumbledore looked different was because they had to use another actor for the originak actor DIED you fuckass. I don’t really know if you are trolling or saying the truth but if you are saying the truth, well, your excuses are stupid! Get a life asshole!
Yours truly,
twihards_are_assholes
you are worst than anybody in the entire world twihards are scum and people who worship twilight should give themselves the most painful death you can ever imagine
yeah and just another potterhead, great comment. couldnt have put it any better
First of all… WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??
1. u say Bella teaches ppl the true meaning of love? ya sure! thats why when her ”lover” leaves her she curls up in a ball and sobs. Where as when the love of hermiones life leaves her, she stays a fighter and holds her friends hand in fighting the most darkest wizard of all time. Every girl dreams to be like hermione not bella. do u think ur parents want to encourage their kids to lose their virginity and marry someone when they’re not done with college? and specially to a guy their daughter has known for only 1 yr? Every parent wants their daughter to be a strong women and a fighter. they want her to be in a strong relationship based on trust. hermione and ron knew each other for over 7 yrs before they got married. Ron loved hermione with all his heart and respected her a lot, whereas edward is just a weird stalker vampire-fairy.
2. kristen is UGLY. first of all she has NO EXPRESSION. whereas emma is gorgeous and takes her job seriously
3. Even stephanie meyer must have gotten tired of writing the series and stopped at book 4.
JK Rowling took initiative, also because of the LARGE number of fans of her and wrote 7 books with 8 movies.
4. Harry Potter teaches us the true meaning of friendship and loyalty. whereas twilight only has 3 characters of which all are immature and love that one girl. which makes no sense
THEREFORE… TWILIGHT SUCKS AND SO DOES IT’S CHARACTERS.
HARRY POTTER ROCKS ❤
P.S: U really need to work on ur spelling.
Hi again!
I haven’t been on really for the last week, and that’s because I’ve been really sick. I had this awful flu and I felt super lousy, basically all I could do was to lie on the couch drinking ginger and watch movies while trying not to move and not to puke.
Anyway though, while I was sick, I had a lot of time on my hands, so first thing I did was watching all of my twilight movies once again. Then I decided that I’d watch the Harry Potter movies (I have them all at my house because my little sister is a big fan) too and I would compare them a little bit. Of course I am probably a bit biased in favor of Twilight because I am such a huge fan of it, but I am trying to be kind and fair in my comparison.
The Twilight movies were definitely better than the Harry Potter ones, and I honestly did like Harry Potter, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t, it’s just that Twilight is just so much better, and here’s why:
1. The Twilight movies stick to the books better. Twilight movies are practically the books, just in film. They stick really closely to the books and don’t make weird changes. Also all of the characters match their descriptions, like Edward, Jacob and Bella – all match their physical descriptions in the books. In HP… not so much. For example, Percy Weasley in HP is supposed to wear glasses, and he didn’t wear them in the movie; Harry’s scar is supposed to be in the middle of his forehead and not way of the side. Thus Harry Potter movies are much less faithful to the books.
2. The Twilight movies have better music. The soundtracks got me into all these awesome Indian and rock bands music, and all the HP soundtracks are just classical melodies. No words or lyrics! I admit that sometimes the music just sets the mood and you don’t need lyrics. That works for a movie, so there is no need to waste resources to make a CD of it. I mean, who listens to boring classical stuff like that? The Twilight soundtracks are real music. The Harry Potter soundtracks are just made by people trying to make a quick buck.
3. The Twilight movies don’t drastically change the characters’ appearances. For example, Dumbledore looked completely different after the first two movies – there were major costume, wig and makeup changes. It was almost like a whole different person. I mean, seriously, that’s just awful that they did that! I do admit that the actor who played Dumbledore after the second movie was better, but couldn’t they make him look the same? And Malfoy had his hair slicked back in the first 2 movies, and then they just let it out, and then in the 6th movies, they put gel in it again! Make up your mind! And Hermione! She has frizzy hair in the first two, and then cute waves in the rest. I mean seriously, be realistic! Don’t change character appearances like that!
4. The Twilight movies are really meaningful. There’s awesome dialogue sequences and they talk about important stuff. The Harry Potter movies are mainly just a ton of action and yes, these is some important dialogue, but not as much as Twilight. And most of the important stuff gets cut out of the movies. Remember the 6th movie? It was almost nothing like the book, and they cut out most of the memories Dumbledore shows Harry!
5. Ok, this isn’t a reason why Twilight is better, but I would just like to state that the Harry Potter movies have really good special effects. For example, they made Hagrid look huge, all the characters look freaky and wizardly, and they made a castle and dragons, so go HP special effects guys! And Twilight had awesome special effects too, like the vampires sparkling and the super speed and strength and things like that, not to mention all the blood, so go Twilight special effects guys too!
6. Twilight just has a better plot. That is all.
7. And the Twilight characters are better looking too.
My contradictions
1. they stick to the books better because Twilight books are all bones and no meat.
2. Oh, no! No lyrics? Someone must alert the authorities! Real music, my ass. What is wrong with you? A quick buck? I want you to time yourself writing what you call “real music” and then time yourself writing a GOOD symphony. Then we’ll see which is the quick buck. and, btw, hundreds of people listen to “boring classical music”.
3. Dumbledore changed because the first Dumbledore DIED! Malfoy is amazing, and who care what his hair looks like? Oh, dear maybe Hermione’s parents said, you know what, you’re turning thirteen this year. We are going to let you stlye your hair! DUH!
4. Imporatant stuff like “I watch you when you sleep,” and “I’d rather die that live a day without you,” Well, you know something about Bella? “She NEEDS to straighten out her priorities!”
5.Yes, yes they do.
6. Twilight is for people who think that having a plot is “so last year”. Take away the love triangle, and you get a girl who moves to a town where it rains a lot.
7. You. are. extremely. out. of. touch. Go look up malfoy, or neville, or even harry!
I think I’m going to puke.
I also I love listening to the Harry Potter music it is amazing and beautiful!!!!!
My fellow potterheads will get this… Including your sister.
TROOOOLLLL!! TROOOLLLLLL IN THE DUNGEON!!
I see what you did there.
Prefects, lead your Houses back to the dormitories immediately!
[Forgive me, fellow potterheads, if I have any errors in that. I do not have my trusty book one on hand and had to quote from memory…]
Slytherin Dormitories are in the dungeons… LOL Malfoy you’re screwed.
I see what you did there. 😂
A twishitard like you deserves to be lobotomized ! You are a disgrace to mankind.
You believe this? (✌ﾟ∀ﾟ)☞ Ha, americans.
You know what would be awesome? If liking Twilight could be a crime, and the punishment was death!
I agree 100%.
This girl is a moron and does not have any valid points in her arguments. It makes it absolutely pathetic. Whether she is a troll or not she’s talking crap about the book series that saved my life.
Oh dear god, you need help. Poor child. Please listen to me as I explain to you why Twilight gives you the wrong ideas about life.
1. No movie is exactly like the book. there are things that NEED to be left out, for time issues, so they make more sense to someone who has never read it, just to improve flow. I know that Twilight can’t be exactly like it.
2. This one really boils my blood. I spend HOURS a day practicing that “boring music”. There are people who’s LIVES are dedicated to that music that “isn’t real”. Let me tell you, missy, that that music is full of more EMOTION and SKILL then any stupid music in Twilight. That music is beautiful and it holds deep meaning. That music is the sounds of people’s CHILDHOOD. Someday, you’ll understand.
3. Dumbledore looked different in the first two movies because he was a different person. A very old man. Who died. He left that entire cast and crew broken hearted. His last words to the director? “Don’t you dare recast me.” Meaning that, even though he knew that he would most likely die, he didn’t want them to start looking for another man to play Dumbledore because he was going to fight up until the minute he died. If that doesn’t touch you in some way, your emotions are seriously lacking.
4. How. Dare. You. You are saying that Twilight had more morale messages, more beauty and love and pain and death and life? NEVER. NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS. The people who died where REAL TO ME. Real to me an millions of others. A few things to point out; JK made Ron poor so that kids would understand how it felt to have no money when everybody else did. She Killed Hedwig to symbolize the fact that Harry’s childhood was ending, killed Dumbledore to make the point that even without a leader, a war could still be won. James proved that even a Bully could become a great man. Lilly proved that there is nothing more powerful then a mother’s love. And Harry proved that, with courage, anything can be done. Bella said that you need a man to be someone. Tell me now which has the better message to send to imppresionable young children?
5. “Freaky and Wizardy”. Gee, thanks.
6. Romance about sparkly vampires, or journey to save humanity? Which sounds like the more exciting plot to you?
7. A, you obviously haven’t seen Neville or Draco lately, B, Cedric Diggory IS Edward. You can’t say he’s better looking then himself
Well, I had been hearing a lot about Harry Potter vs Twilight and I found myself on the Harry Potter side. I decided to scope the web to check out the Twilight side, too, though, because I thought it wouldn’t be fair to be so Anti-Twilight without at least getting all the facts. After 1 Twilight movie and this website, I see I was right the first time.
Number three is so sad :c
You know, when you stated that you were going to be kind and fair I actually believed you. My mistake. This is just so positively offensive. Richard Harris, the wonderful actor that played Dumbledore, passed away in which afterward, they brought in Sir Micheal Gambon. I know that you weren’t aware, but it is still very ignorant and disrespectful.
While I will admit that the movies weren’t completely according to the books, that’s part of the excitement. To see new wonders not before thought of come to life onscreen is such an incredible experience and frankly, I’m quite glad that it wasn’t exact. You don’t know what you’re going to get and that adds to the excitement and anticipation.
The soundtrack is a magnificent piece of work. An orchestra led by one of the greatest conductors how could it not be? It is not boring. Its beautiful. It’s relaxing yet exciting and call me a critic but I find that it is incredibly difficult to find that in most music.
With the character of Hermione, it is more of character development. With the Yule Ball she is no longer seen as a stern bookworm but a beautifully blossomed young woman that any young lady could look up to.
The Harry Potter movies do have vital dialogue. To think that the movies aren’t meaningful is complete bollocks.
And as for who is better looking than who, I was aware that this was a post about the movies, not looks. Looks have nothing to do with it.
Thank you for making me lose a hint more of hope in humanity. And yes, call me whatever name you may call me. At least I didn’t say I was going to be kind.
Yours Truly,
Laura
1. No movie is exactly like the book. If it was, some people might not want to see it because why waste money too see a movie when the script is exactly like the paperback novel that you already have? Don’t forget time issues. Twilight also cuts out a few things and changes a detail or two, how else do you think that six-seven hundred pages worth of plot is placed into a two-hour film? Harry Potter stays just as true to the books as Twilight did.
2. I like the soundtrack for Twilight but I love the Harry Potter soundtrack too so I’m pretty sure I don’t regret telling you that you’re a pathetic idiot. You think that music has to have lyrics to be meaningful and amazing? Ever head of ‘Für Elise’ by Mozart? That’s what’s called a CLASSIC and it has be known as a classic for hundreds of years. I think classical music is not only gorgeously written but can range from a degree of thousands of emotions and are not people who are just trying to “make a quick buck”. And don’t forget, in Twilight Edward Cullen and Bella Swan love ‘Claire de Lune’ by Debussy and what do you think is playing on in the background when there are all these little moments? That’s right, music without words. Try thinking next time before you not only insult an entire genre but also including your own character’s favourite melody.
3. Who cares about having Hermione using hair gel when she grows up or Draco deciding on a new hairdo? Obviously, a person changes hairstyles when they grow up, as if you haven’t tried a different hairstyle or two when you were growing up. Didn’t they have to change Alice’s hairstyle from a bob to a pixie cut and doesn’t Bella grow paler when she turns into a vampire? Oh yeah, and the reason Dumbledore looks different is because he was recast. You know why he was recast? Because the original actor DIED. Try looking something up on Google first before being so biased about a character recast. The last thing the actor said when he was filming the movie was ‘don’t you dare recast me’ because he knew that his eleven granddaughter would want him to do it. Saying that Dumbledore’s recast is annoying and insulting to the character description is just plain disrespectful.
4. You think that ‘Harry Potter’ doesn’t have a lot of meaningful dialogues and prose when Twilight is all about having a boyfriend? You’re really bringing that up? Well, for starters, Harry Potter is not just about action and magic, it’s about finding the courage to do the right thing even at the risk of danger. It’s about loving and respecting other people. It’s about being loyal to your own friends and coming of age in a time of war. It’s about becoming a good person even with a horrible past. It’s about being willing to sacrifice even your own life for what you believe in and for the people you love. People died and gave up almost everything they had and they fought to the death. Students and teachers and real people fought in a war where the youngest soldiers were only sixteen or seventeen. What does Bella talk about again? Oh yeah, being horny, suicidal and pondering the decision of giving up her back-up boyfriend even when she’s engaged. Hermione and Ginny trumps Bella any day since they stay behind to defend a cause worth fighting for when their boyfriends left them instead of Bella who curled up and sobbed in the middle of the woods which caused not only her father but almost the entire town to worry about the fact that she may have been kidnapped by a serial killer. Oh no, she was just taking her time to come out of the dark woods like Little Red Riding Hood.
5. And you think the plot is better? Please excuse me for my flames and my sarcasm when I congratulate you on the fact you think that a story of a girl who throws away everything for a vampire boy, even her own life, but still plays around with a teenage werewolf whom she knows has a crush on her is a meaningful plot . Cheers.
6. Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe and Tom Felton. Enough said but just to hit it home, Cedric Diggory. That’s right, you just insulted your precious Edward Cullen.
P.S. I don’t hate the ‘Twilight’ series entirely, I have to admit that sometimes it’s entertaining to watch even though the main character has horrible priorities. I just hated the fact that you not only wrote an offensive article about the Harry Potter series (which I love far more) but you also did it with reasons that are idiotically nonsensical.
If Hermione Granger, Annabeth Chase, Katniss Everdeen, And Bella Swan were to be in a deathmatch, Bella would be dead in a second.
10 REASONS WHY YOU’RE AN IDIOT.
1. Your english SUCKS.
2. You have CLEARLY NEVER read a single book. The only thing you’ve read is thrash aka (by the way since you’re probably not educated enough to know what that mean’s it is ‘Also known as’) Twilight.
3. To quote Emma Watson “Twilight sells Sex’. And I don’t think that a book that “sells sex” can be compared to a book that creates a world of magic.
4. Meyers = Poop. JKR = The Queen. The queen > Poop. JKR > Meyers. Its math really.
5. Jacob Black (BLACK Reference to Sirius Blacks legendary family) is eternally in love with Isabella Swan. And that’s why “IMPRINTS” on her 1 day year old daughter? Amazing.
6. Twilight = Pedophilia.
7. Twilight = Necrophilia.
8. Twilight tells young girls to trip everywhere, looks pukish all the time, date 100 year old creeps, walk out on your dad.
9. The fact that you can stand for twilight means that your are mentally impaired.
10. YOU. ARE. AN. IDIOT.
Thank You
Dumblodore looked different because he was played by a different person. The original actor died tragically just after the second movie so Michael gambon took over. The music fits what the story is about. If you would have read the books you would have found out that they had many wizard pop bands. Also has anyone noticed that bella went to school two years longer than you actually go to school. Also vampires can not eat human food. Edward eats Hellas pizza, which has GARLIC on it. Rant over
I feel sorry for your gene pool.
1. Read the book 1984? Then you should watch the movie. Being faithful to the original do not equal good.
2. Erh… You should watch a concert or something. There is a tonne of talented people needed to produce classical music. Also, while at it, play some final fantasy games. If you need lyrics to be pleasant to listen to, then you’re not good music.
3. So… You look the same as you did when you were 10 years old? (Ignoring the fact that they had to change director and everything by the third movie)
4. How can a romantic story be better than a plot about racism, bravery, acceptance of everybody’s differences and the dangers of when you ignore the history?
Only when you ask a teenage girl.
5. Well, it is mostly quite simple and cheap tricks they’re using…
6. Of course, the films will never be able to show all the side-plots, the midnight duell, why Harry knew where the tiara of ravenclaw was, the snitch and it’s secrets.
If you think that the twillight films are equal to the books, well, then they must be really boring!
7. Well, one of the things jk told us about was inner beauty. If you look great but have no mind, you’re just a doll. The characters in the movie are much more pretty than the ones in the books….
A reason why the first 2 harry potter movies are different from the rest because they got a different director. Okay? Just thought I’d let you know that.
i hope a dementor comes & fetches you & feeds you to the bassilisk. HP’s only for civilized people unlike you with only your lack of intelligence to keep your small little mind busy with shit !
I WILL PUNCH YOU.
PLEASE DO NOT COMPARE THE GREAT HARRY POTTER WITH THE POOR twilight…. BECOZ HARRY POTTER IS WAY,WAY,WAY MUCH BETTER THAN that poor thing twilight!!! JUST LIKE HOW MUCH JK ROWLING IS BETTER THAN THAT SEXUAL STEPHANIE MEYER!!!! THE PERSON WHO LOVE TWILIGHT IS A SEX-CRAZY PERSON.. THAT IS WHY THEY READ TWILIGHT… AND IF YOU DISAGREE ME @lizziebella … I DARE YOU TO REPLY MY COMMENT… AND THEN SO WE CAN ARGUE ABOUT WHO IS BETTER… I KNOW HP WILL WIN.. HARRY POTTER THOUGHT ME ABOUT BEING BRAVE…. SO TELL ME WHAT DOES TWILIGHT TEACH YOU???????
sincerely,
a 13 years old POTTERHEAD
1. Okay, I agree, but the movies are still great! 🙂
2. The music in Twilight is beautiful, but it doesn’t find a speciel place in your heart like the music in Harry Potter do.
3. People can change alot! My hair was really curly and I was plantin blond (I don’t know what you call it in english. I’m from Denmark) for 2 years ago, and now it has beautiful waves, and is almost brown.
Maybe Draco did’nt want gel in his hair that year. Peoples opinion changes too.
4.Yes, Twilight has a meaning, but Harry Potter has to. The Harry Potter movies tells people that everyone can be friends. Purebloods can be friends with mudbloods. In the real world the popular people can be friends with the “normal” people. Twilight teaches about love, but I really don’t get why Bella goes so crazy over Edward that she tries to kill her self, just to see him. Maybe they’re really in love, but kill your self because he leaves?
Btw, it’s not action. It’s fantasy.
5. I agree. The special effects in Harry Potter is fantastic! Twilight’s special effects are okay.
6. So movies there teaches you that you can’t live without your true love is better than movies there teaches you to be brave, loyal, friendly and to be your self?
7. Maybe they do, but it doesn’t make the movies better. Kristen Stewart is pretty, but is a terrible actor. I can never tell if she’s happy, sad or angry. But the Harry Potter actors clearly shows how they feel.
Twilight is fine, but I like Harry Potter the best 🙂
Listen, get the fuck out of here. Harry potter cannot be understood by muggles like you. And, no one asked your opinion about harry potter, you filthy little mudblood! You’re making a fool of yourself. And to all the ppl who have commented above, thank you. 🙂 and you, mudblood, dare not post shit like this again. Get me!? Now fuck off!
I really don’t like you. Does anyone know her address?? I WILL BEAT HER ASS FOR HER EVEN THINKING ABOUT COMPARING HARRY POTTER TO TWILIGHT!!! I WILL BEAT HER ASS FOR MY FELLOW POTTER HEADS THAT THINK SHE DESERVES IT!!! WHY ON EARTH WOULD SHE THINK THAT TWILIGHT IS BETTER TWILIGHT IS RETARDED!!! I BURNED MY TWILIGHT BOOKS IN MY BACKYARD!!! I. HATE. TWILIGHT.
oh, and BTW, those “werewolves” look like fugly cats! ANYWHORE thanks for your time SLUT!
1) The actor playind Dumbledore fucking died! Way to be sensitive…
2) At the start of the HP movies they were meant to be 11, at the end they were 18, don’t tell me that you never changed your hairstyle in 7 years!
3) Twilight has a better plot? Um, no, HP is about escaping oppression and genocide, Twilight is about finding your one Twu Wuv and never letting him go. Because that’s SO important…
4) I’m gritting my teeth at the good looks thing, seriously? Darco Malfoy’s hot, and Fred, George, Neville (in the last few) and even the guy who plays young Tom Riddle is nice looking. In Twilight we have Rattinson, the vain prick with a rectangular head and Taylor Lautner who has a fit body, the only one truly worth mentioning is Jackson Rathbone (Jasper).
5) True, the special effects in both movies are good, but HP’s are better, they have magic, werewolves, randomly conjured snakes, polyjuice potion, Voldemort and Bellatrix’s awesome deaths, the pensive smoke stuff etc.. Sparkles are nothing in comparison.
6) True, the Twilight movies were closer to their respective books, but that is because the Twilight books are hundreds of pages of nothing. they could have been written as one book. Whereas HP was lots off stuff that had to be crammed into 8 movies.
TOTALLY AGREE! and Hermione’s hair just CHANGED, when you grow up your hair changes!!! OMG
To be honest although i agree are you sure this author of this blog has been alive for long enough to know how much you change in 7 years.
Harry Potter is much better than Twilight!!!!!!! The plot for Twilight is about a little whiny teenager who goes around sulking because she has to live in a rainy with her FATHER!!!! And then she meets this dude who looks like he’s constipated and she instantly “falls in love,” AND DON’T EVEN GET ME STARTED ON HOW HE COMES INTO HER ROOM AND WATCHES HER SLEEP EVERY NIGHT!! I MEAN, CAN YOU SAY PEDOPHILE??!?!!? HE’S FU**ING 109 YEARS OLD!! HE SAID SO HIMSELF!! And then he leaves her and she turns into a zombie for 4 friggin months! And I would be happy if he left!! The less chances of her getting drained!!! And then she goes and risks her neck for a dude who doesn’t even what her anymore!!
How dare you mention the death of Dumbledore???!!!! HIS ACTOR DIED!!!! YOU ARE SO INSENSITIVE!!!!
You are an insensitive, stupid, idiotic, moronic, retard, dipshit bitch.
Enough said.
Everyone has basically said what I think about your “reasons” but I just want to add (if not added already) that creating original classical music is not a “quick buck”. It’s easier to simply pay a band for their one song than it is to pay a composer and orchestra and all the other people needed to create a score of different songs. In case you didn’t know, the composer of the first two films was John Williams, you know him at least right? In case not, you would be wise to look him up.
Are you blind to the fact that most of the people reading this so-called Twilight fan sight are Harry Potter fans over and above Twilight. Personally i have nothing against Twilight but you made me hate it and it’s movies. I apologize Stephanie Meyer for this girls ignorance and unintentional mockery of her favourite books. As others have said: I sincerely hope that this is a troll…
Plus please read your reasons to someone who has a brain before you post them. Please.
Are you stupid? Harry potter clearly has an awful load of good points or else it wouldn’t have sold so well. or are you going to say that every household is stupid and that’s why they’ve got the books? Harry potter is a world wide phenomenon and is the first series of books to create a millionaire. Twilight can’t say that Stephenie Meyer has written many books to get to the stage she is in now unlike JK Rowling who wrote the harry potter series making her internationally known. Also Harry potter actually teaches children to be true to themselves and to be a good friend who is unselfish whilst twilight teaches people that it’s okay to have a 109 year old watch you sleep if he’s hot and that if your in Bella’s position your the center of everybody’s world. If you want to live like that then i hope i never have to meet you.
Let me say something to you, Go kill yourself. Harry Potter’s soundtrack was made by John Williams and that is an effing awesome sound track. The special effects on Twilight are awful. I could make me running fast or sparkling any time for about 10 bucks when twilight probably did it for a million. Twilight is meaning full, it is about a chick who is attracted to a 109 year old vampire and she is sad that she can’t get him. I mean, if she does not get him, it is not the end of the world but if Voldemort gains power, we go bye bye. Harry Potter is not the best movies by far but twilight is not even close to the Caliber twilight has. I don’t care if u like twilight, but go kill yourself for saying twilight is better
You are not serious!!
Firstly, the Harry Potter films stick to the books closely. They had to edit some things out because it would otherwise be a three hour film! Maybe Percy got magical laser eye surgery, but that’s a tiny detail. It doesn’t
diminish the value of the whole film. It’s crazy how you can just say that those tiny things change the meaning.
2. The Harry Potter music is awesome! They had a whole friggin orchestra and it compliments the films tremendously. The twilight soundtrack is jut a bunch of songs which are made to make money. They don’t even go with the films! Harry Potter music is made to enhance the films, not sell a few soundtracks and make the whe franchise cheap.
3. WHAT THE HELL? RICHARD HARRIS DIED AND YOU’RE COMPLAINING ABOUT GETTING A DIFFERENT ACTOR? No. Just no. Furthermore, all the other characters grew up, hence why their looks changed. They diet do it by choice, it was how the actors grew.
4. To mention the glorious Mr. King, twilight is but about how important it is to have a boyfriend. How is that meaningful? Harry Potter is about friendship, adversity in the face of evil and standing up for what is right. Harry Potter made me into the person I am today and it carved my love of English literature. I know we’re talking about films but THAT HAS TO MAKE IT MEANINGFUL. GAWD.
5. You saw sense
6. You lost it again.
7. THIS MEANS MOTHIMG! Normal characters make it more realistic. Not everyone is beautiful. Actually, a vampire would want to blend in because being noticed as a bloodsucker isn’t great. Bing beautiful just gets you bloody noticed!
If you make a whole blog about insulting a whole fandom, expect a few comments about people FIGHTING BACK. HARRY POTTER FOR THE WIN. YEAH.
Just adding some pointed that I forgot to mention in my first comment.
1) It actually does not say in any of the Harry Potter books that his scar is in the centre of his forehead. It is meant to be to one side.
4) Twilight doesn’t have meaningful dialogue. It has twenty seven minutes worth of stares.
On fanfiction.net Harry Potter has a grand total of 645,078 fanfictions and counting while Twilight has 210,384 fanfictions total. That is over a 400,000 fanfiction difference. And you say that we have a bad plot. Harry Potter teaches us things about life. There is amazingly important dialogue and great revelations that make it worth reading and watching. J. K. Rowling actually ties in the importance of love into the action and there are different kinds of love like Lily’s love for Harry and Snapes love for Harry and Harry’s friends love for him. It also teaches us that love isnt perfect and it doesnt always work out (Snape). It also teaches you to stand up for your cause and to be brave. It tells you everyone has flaws and mistakes will happen. Death is inevitable also J. K showes that people you love may die in a war. The deaths in Harry Potter meant something and made you sad but you knew that it was for the greater good. Twilight teaches you to be overly dependent, suicidal, inconclusive, stalker like, and to leave your family and friends behind, and have a teen pregnancy. Bella leaves her friends and family and doesn’t say anything after they welcomed her with open arms. It was said that she was forced to make tough decisions and grow up early due to her mothers childish behaviour but her actions in Twilight depict her as a childish teenager that needs her boyfriend to guide her and keep her safe. She acts as if she has had everything handed to her and has nothing to stay a human for, I learned from Twilight that it is better to live eternally than have a short life of happiness with friends and support from friends and family.
In Harry Potter you say that there are drastic changes from the books to the movies. Well the costume designer probably that that it would fit a bit better with the Draco to have his hair slicked back at first because it portrayed higher standing, but then he became more rebellious and then back to refined when he joined the Death Eaters. Hermione’s hair was perfectly normal as people’s hair can change easily. Harry still had his scar it was just a bit left. And so maybe Percy didn’t want to wear his glasses all the time. These aren’t even drastic changes from the books. Just a few tweaks that they felt would better fit. In Twilight Jacob left his family and pack for Bella who didn’t even love him. He rides a motorcycle,his last name is Black, and he turns into a giant, oversized dog (cough SIRIUS BLACK cough).
If you want to argue that Twilight’s plot is better than Harry Potter’s then you are wrong, Harry Potter teaches you loyalty, bravery, love is strong, overcome your fears, fight for your beiefs, the list goes on and on and on. There are many mini plots and twists and turns in the book that made it worthwhile and a good book to read over and over again and the movies were great, they weren’t messed up and kept the same basic plot line.
Music, the Harry Potter soundtrack is amazing, the theme itself is enjoyed by many people. Classic music came first and without there wouldn’t be any so called Real Music. And besides, Hogwarts is an old-fashioned school with quills and dungeons. Why would they put modern music in it!?!?
The special effects in Twilight are strange, Why the hell would you want to sparkle? Look at me! I’m a vampire guy who sparkles, YIPPIE!!! (Note the sarcasm). The special effects in Harry Potter include, the ceiling of the great hall,, Buckbeak, Hagrid, the dragon, Magical creatures in general, spells, and a lot of others.
Just an FYI that hotness doesn’t have to do with everything. Okay it seems like that is your defence for everything and that is superficial and shallow. And by the way Tom Felton, Dan Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman, Matthew Lewis, are all very handsome while Emma Watson, Bonnie Wright, Evanna Lynch, and many others are beautiful. There is also something called inner beauty that some lucky souls possess and that is much better than your “hotness” and calling people “HAWT”
Also Harry Potter has many meaningful things that you can quote from Dumbledore and many other people. It has wise words that are true and you can live by like “Do not pity the dead Harry. Pity the living, and above all those who live without love.” It shows the importance of living but also shows how if you live without love your life is worthless. Also you know that because there are different kinds of love you can assume that it means to stay open to other ideas.
So next time you want to bash a fandom, stay away from Harry Potter because there is no possible way you can win.
1. You spelled spelling wrong.
2. There is no important dialogue in twilight I have read all the books and never once did a character say anything that was relatable to anything in real life. The entire series is about how it is important to have a boyfriend and how women are less important than men and have no place in society. Meanwhile Harry Potter teaches
you about love, friendship, equality and standing up for what you believe in.
3. J.K. Rowling is the best author to ever live. Her writing is so detailed and intricate that no one could ever beat her ever. She is
better than Stephanie Meyer by a lot (and I mean a lot), she is better than Suzane Collines and Veronica Roth and John Green and I promise you that almost every person that has read Harry Potter would agree with
me.
4. Have you even read Harry Potter because it doesn’t sound like you have.
5. Of course the characters look different after the first two movies there was like three years between the second and third movie I mean the actor for Dumbledore changed Hermiones hair changed because after your 12 your not going to go around with your hair looking like a bush ( believe me I know my hair is just like Hermione’s)
6. You have to put classic melodies in Harry Potter it’s about a world that doesn’t have any electricity they can’t use auto tune and it would just sound wrong to have rock or alternative or pop music in the movies.
7. Twilight has the most boring plot if any book I have ever read.
8. No the Twilight actors are not better looking Robert Patinaon has a weird crooked nose, Kristen Stuart always looks like she is upset and high and Taylor Lautner looks like a llama. Now please go and google Tom Felton and Mettew Lewis and tell me they are not gorgeous.
Bye 😀
I just turned 12 and I have hair like a bush about how long will it settle down
it starting to get curly instead of bushy
actually the Dumbledore in the first two died so they had to use a different one
Hermione grows up like that its called puberty when she is little she has puffy hair and it gets straighter as she grows
also
don’t judge on who is better looking that is racist and prejudice you hav said mean stuff about ginger ppl tht is not nice
don’t judge on plotline cuz hp has a waaaaaaaaaaaaay better plot line if you had ACTUALLY ReAD the books you would understand
I like your sister waaaaaaaay better than you
besides j.k rowling minds her own business and lives her life
unlike Stephanie meyer who made twimore
to mock j.k rowling thts horrible
I am cheering for your sister she seems smart to me
Hello.
I see your SPELLING and APPARENT style are not BETTER.
Before I start my counter-arguments (not that what you have here deserves the term ARGUMENTS but still) let me tell you something. I respect your love for Twilight and I wouldn’t bother to reply if you didn’t find it necessary to constantly compare it to HP without an actual logical argument to back up it’s supposed superiority.
And let me tell you beforehand, how hot a guy is, doesn’t count. An actor’s worth is not his face but his acting skills. They are not models, they are actors. There’s a difference. Now if said actor/actress happens to be beautiful that’s a happy coincidence. Charlize Theron won her Oscar for her performance in Monster where she looked like crap. Her talent won her that Oscar not her face.
Moving on to your -God help me- list.
1) BOTH series diverge from the books, not just HP. Pretty much all book based movies have to make changes to fit the transition from paper to the big screen.
I see you still choose to forget what doesn’t suits you but I’m not going to follow your example.
Yes HP books have differences to the books, especially the sixth and fourth, but the rest are pretty much a complete replica of the books. Especially Deathly Hallows, the dialogues of which is almost identical to the novels’. Some things needed to change/cut to fit not only the script but the budget and to make the movies a reasonable length.
As for Twilight…
Examples: 1) Physical descriptions… Laurent was OLIVE skinned not black. Jane was brunette and they aged her and her brother. After all she is described as androgynous, implying she was changed when she was still very young. In the novels Marcus was physically the younger of the Volturi triad and Caius the older. Yet their ages are reversed in the movies. If you want proof read SM’s official site. Renesmee was supposed to look like “a small two year old or a big one year old” not a ten year old. In comparison the changes in the HP books are miniscule.
2) Bella didn’t own a cellphone until Breaking Dawn. She didn’t acquire information about the Cold Ones from the internet (simply because the internet only had the normal legends about vampires) but from Jake and her own conclusions.
3) The big revelation scene ‘you are a vampire’ took place in Edward’s car on their way from Port Angeles -where they had stumbled on Angela and Jessica not that they appeared in the movie- NOT in the woods behind the school. Because apparently in Twilight universe it’s okay to just get up and leave school grounds on school hours without notifiying anyone.
4) Jake came IN THE BALL to deliver Billy’s message while dancing with Bella; he didn’t find them outside.
5) Angela and Eric were NEVER together. She was with Ben.
6) Where exactly is Lauren, Ben, Austin?
7) Um… Bella didn’t get on a bike and rode off with a stranger…
8) Bella never slapped Paul.
9) Jacob didn’t make an appearance in New Moon until Bella went to find him. Yet low and behold there he is delivering a birthday present! When he had no idea when her birthday is!
10) James, Victoria and Laurent didn’t make an appearance till the baseball game near the end of the book. But look! They have scenes beforehand in the movie!
11) Those lovely scenes in Twilight a)Edward announcing he plans to take her to meet his family by jumping on her car -the field that was so prominent is non existent by the way, b)the scene of their first kiss, c)the school trip to that God-Knows=what-it-is place, d)Kryptonite/good guy-bad guy conversation in the school’s cafeteria were either added or greatly altered.
12) SM’s ‘vampires’ sparkle in the sun… You say you watched the movies. Surprising they stop sparkling after New Moon. Probably all the glitter had run out…
13) Jasper graduates with Emmett and Rosaile in Twlight… And guess what? He attends school with Alice and Edward in New Moon!
14) Bella’s character in the movies is in no shape and form the same with the character in the books. She’s tougher and more independent. She actually disobeys Edward’s command to stay away from Jake (another difference from the books. Bella literally run to Jake’s bike to leave the school acting like she committed a crime, when Edward was away and only Alice was there. In the movie she goes with Jake while Edward watches).
And those are just what I remember; and before you throw a fuss everything is double checked. I own copies of all books and films and I checked SM’s official site for a fanfiction I’m writing.
THOSE are facts.
Again when you are making a point, first check to see if it’s valid. Because so far EVERYTHING that you have accused HP of being/doing is what Twilight does/is.
PS: No where in the books is a full description of Bella. Search all you want. She’s brunette with chocolate brown eyes. That’s it.
And just to be clear a character’s physical appearance doesn’t prove the films ‘faithfullness’ to the book. The plot, the personality of each character, their stories, THAT what’s important not someone’s hair colour.
Oh before I forget!
In New Moon and Eclipse we learn Alice can’t see the wolves’ future or Bella’s or her family’s when one of them is close (examples; the outcome of the new born fight, Alice rushing back to Forks because she didn’t see Bella was saved by Jake, Alice calling distressed Bella on her honeymoon because she can’t see her future anymore). In Breaking Dawn we learn Alice can’t see Renesmee’s future.
In Breaking Dawn Part II we see a complete disregard to previously established mythology, created from the author herself, as Alice suddenly, for the sake of making a crappy movie worth seeing and having at least SOME kind of action in an otherwise yawn inducing film, not only sees the outcome of a battle including the wolves but Renesmee and Jake’s future together! Another pedophile by the way.
2) The Twilight movies don’t have BETTER music. They have more popular, age appropriate -for the targeted age group of the franchise- pop/rock songs.
Who listens to boring classical stuff like that? Honey you answered your own question. They are CLASSIC for a reason.
Who’s going to listen to Paramore in a hundred years? How many ballet plays/movies a pop song have inspire? Just because something is popular doesn’t make it better or improve its quality.
John Williams, the composer for the first three Potter films, is considered one of the greatest film composers of ALL TIME. He has won 5 Academy Awards, 4 Golden Globe Awards, 7 British Academy Film Awards and 21 Grammy Awards. With 48 Academy Award nominations, Williams is the second most-nominated person, after Walt Disney. He was honored with the annual Richard Kirk award at the 1999 BMI Film and TV Awards, recognizing his contribution to film and television music. Williams was inducted into the Hollywood Bowl Hall of Fame in 2000, and was a recipient of the Kennedy Center Honors in 2004.
Patrick Doyle, who composed music for the Goblet of Fire, has been nominated for two Academy Awards and two Golden Globe Awards. His resume includes Hamlet, Henry V and Sense and Sensibility.
Alexandre Desplat (who by the way composed music for New Moon as well) and Nicholas Hooper are among the composers of the HP films.
Two of the HP films have been nominated for a best score Oscar.
Which Twilight saga movie can claim the above?
‘The Harry Potter soundtracks are just made by people trying to make a quick buck.’ Sweety if that was true, then the songs picked would have been similar to your saga’s.
3) See point number 1 for starters. Secondly both Edward and Alice had different haircuts in every movie. Unlike HP characters who are humans, their hair don’t grow. Again a fact from SM herself.
Um… Richard Harris, the actor who played Albus Dumbledore in the first two films, DIED. His successor, Micheal Gambon, therefore looks vastly different. Mainly because he wasn’t Harris’ long lost twin brother but a completely different person. Dead people are a touch difficult to act you see.
I know what I’m about to say will come as a grand shock to you but please try to stay calm… People… People change! GASP! I KNOW! Shocking isn’t it!?
Not really. But I’m guessing it is a concept you find hard to grasp since I suspect you are trying to pull a Bella and stay a teenager -with the appropriate mind set- forever. I honestly feel sorry for the people who have to put up with you.
Malfoy grew up. He decided he didn’t like gel for a while. He stopped using it. He’s a person. He’s not supposed to stay exactly.the.same. Not to mention that as he grew older he had other things to worry about rather than his gel.
I know about ten different girls who younger looked like they were electrocuted. Seriously their hair was atrocious. Guess what happened when they grew older?
Their hair smoothed out and calmed.
So differences in hair=realistic and normal. They are not supposed to stay the same like your sparkly vampires. If you want to point a finger take a look at your own darn franchise.
4) I’m sorry, what exactly is meaningful about Twilight? The fact Bella gave up everything and everyone for her boyfriend? The fact she forgives him for all the crap he put her through because he’s oh so great and handsome and rich? The fact the romance they portray is so twisted that they try to make stalking someone, obsessing and controlling relationships okay? The fact that Edward is in all reality a pedophile? The fact that the whole saga encourages young impressionable girls to make themselves completely useless and helpless to get a guy? The fact SM makes Bella’s behaviour over loosing Edward seem okay, essentially telling us it’s okay to disobey our parents, take part in dangerous activities, JUMP OF OFF CLIFFS JUST TO HEAR OUR BOYFRIEND’S VOICE? Or how she makes theft, breaking and entering, murder seem oh so romantic and forgivable? Or Bella’s complete and utter fixation with beauty and staying young (after New Moon she acts like growing older is repulsive!)? For the love of God in the end of Breaking Dawn she appears relieved for not only her daughter not dying but staying YOUNG FOREVER! READ THE DAMN BOOK IF YOU WANT PROOF!
HP promotes friendship and unity. It teaches us that the right way might not always be the easy one but we have to be strong enough to fight our fears. In HP we learn that it’s OK to be different. Not all people are the same and being unique is nothing to be ashamed about. It teaches us about loss and finding comfort in your loved ones.
To quote Stephen King: “Harry Potter is all about confronting fears, finding inner strength, and doing what is right in the face of adversity. Twilight is about how important it is to have a boyfriend.”
Suck it up.
5) Difference between special effects since you went there. HP films have about nine Oscar nominations for score, art direction, costumes, visual effects and cinematography.
Twilight saga’s last film (I won’t bother to check the rest) has zero Oscar nominations (actually no Twilight film has ever been nominated for an Academy Award) and had 11 nominations and 7 wins (!!!) in the Golden Raspberry Awards.
And that’s how you prove quality. With simple facts.
6) Twilight has a trite overused plot; a plot that’s a combination of Vampire Diaries, True Blood and pretty much every vampire book in existence. *Before you go all Twihard, please check the facts. The Vampire Diaries books came out in the very early 90s and True Blood is based on The Southern Vampire Mysteries, also known as The Sookie Stackhouse Novels, which were published in 2001. Not to mention that SM copied HP. The character of Sirius Black was one of her favourites and she gave his last name to Jacob and Esme’s character is based on Molly Weasley. Check it out if you don’t believe me. She said so herself.
And by the way, going on and on, for four books about how perfect Edward is, how much she loves him, how happy they are together and how protective Edward is, without really moving forward is not a good plot. The only thing that could have made it a touch less annoying is the infamous love triangle; if it wasn’t so painfully obvious Bella would never ever choose Jacob over Edward. All she does is string him along, hurt him and play with his emotions because she’s a needy, manipulative pathetic excuse of a human being who I’m embarrassed to say is considered a role model for thousands of young girls.
Not to mention how utterly one dimensional the characters are. Seriously. They have absolutely no depth. SM would have the sun shining out Edward’s arse if she could pull it through. At least the secondary characters are more real and interesting.
HP on the other hand is UNIQUE. Rowling spent ten years working on her plot and characters, she knows everything about every character no matter how insignificant. She created a whole new world hidden within our own and her characters don’t feel like simple book characters. When you read the books you sympathize and empathize with them. You cry when they hurt and die, and you laugh at the jokes. And you can actually relate to them. Everyone knows a Hermione, a Harry, a Ron and Draco. They are flawed like everyone else. She created people and that’s proof of the series superiority.
7) I respectfully disagree with that statement. And once again that is not an argument for the films’ superiority. You don’t compare models. You compare actors. Judge their acting not their pretty faces.
In my opinion Emma Watson is an astoundingly beautiful and talented actress. She’s not perfect, she needs to work on her acting but she’s good. Kristen Stewart started promising (I’m a fan of her earlier work) but killed all my love with her monotonous, one dimensional, catatonic portrayal of Bella Swan. She’s pretty but not in Emma’s league. But that’s MY opinion and in no way proof the HP films are better than Twilight.
Once again you have no valid points. All you do is type what you think, without first checking its validity and try to pass it off as proof of Twilight’s greatness when in reality you prove better than any HP fan ever could what a complete waste of money and time the Twilight series is.
Have a lovely day.
How stupid. Twilight has NO plot and the characters in twilight being more ‘attractive’ is a rubbish reason. Plus, Emma Watson is much prettier than the actress that acts as Bella and Edward has the SAME actor as CEDRIC DIGGORY in HP and Jacob is about as handsome as a gorilla wearing pants. The twilight movies AREN’T MEANINGFUL AT ALL! And music in movies is to build a mood. Not for you to listen to like pop stuff. All these reasons are complete crap. HP PWNS TWILIGHT
And we got TOM FELTON. he’s really hot.
Me disproving everything you say
1 twilight does not fit the charcter descriptions it said nowhere that Bella could not display any emotion also Alice and Carlyle did not look anything like she was supposed to in the movie. In the case of Harry Potter do honestly think that any movie producer could fit all the in depth story plots and characters in the movie. Harry’s scar was on the side because it made it easier for Dan and his makeup artist to work with it.
2 So you are seriously complaining about the music this is where you have got to use your brain. Harry Potter is set in a freaking castle. So you think rock would be good set in a castle. Also in Harry Potter what you are looking at is far more important than what you are hearing it simply sets the tone, unlike in twilight the plot is what you are focusing on. As for the soundtrack I listen to classical it tells stories and requires actual complexity and talent to write unlike Justin bieber.
3 In case you did not know the actor who played Dumbledore died I think being a completely different person gives you the right to look different. The movies and books take time over a 7 year period. I would hope the way you look changed over time hermiones hair changed because at 11 and 12 girls are not so self conscience about how they look then they change. Malfoys hair changes to reflect how stable his life is. Talk about being realistic if not changing for 7 years is realistic to you then you are probly around ALOT of dwarfs (not achondroplasia but the other kind). Use your brain.
4 the lack of action scences makes twilight uninteresting I don’t know why people watch a load of dialouge that does not move the lack of plot along.
5 Making sparkly skin is easy you can make anything sparkle on a computer by selecting an area right click an add visual effect it is on any visual effects. I know because I do Miny movies. Blood isn’t even special effects it is a pouch of take blood under the shirt it is pictured to release the blood and looks like bleeding. It can be punctured electronically for gunshot. If it on skin then it can be stamped or painted on, to add depth to the wound it is skin covered clay. Speed is simply speeding the fpr (frames per second) strength is different it depends on the object but most of the time it is a copy and past job.
6 For starters that is an opinion. Twilights plot is about 2 people falling in love except one is a vampire and the other is a wolf it is a classic blue rose plot and a choice. Harry potter is good vrs evil doing what is right choosing your battle and soooo many more if you don’t like one pick the other.
7 Scince when did looks play into how good a movie and that is an opinion Edward looked better as Cedric and Jacob looks fat with his shirt on
You are a fucking waste of time and space. GET YOUR MOTHERFUCKING SHIT STRAIGHT BEFORE YOU POST THIS CRAP. Why the hell would they look the same the entire time, retard? I hope you threw up until you threw up blood, ran to the phone to call 911, but died gurgling blood at the phone.
Please say you’re just a troll, as this is all hiliriously funny.
You’re honestly a dipshit.
Point 1. Film adapations are made to be a little different to the books. If you want exactly the same as the book, you read the fucking book. A film adaptation is to see the book and see the slight changes and interpratations of the characters, their apperances and how they act. Obviously the poor twilight director didn’t really have alot to go off from the twilight books because they were so dull.
2. The Twilight music didn’t really fit with the scenes to be honest, whereas the HP music was written for the scenes. The music was oringal and beautiful, obviosuly a girl your age can’t comprehend music without words, and that’s obviously just SO OLD. You have the wrong idea going.
3. People’s apperance’s change. There’s a thing called puberty that I guess you haven’t gone through yet, I mean i’m still pretty young, but even I understand what puberty means. It adds meaning, watching the characters grow and change, instead of just rushing through the books and getting different actors playing different stages of their lives, they grew up with the films and the characters progressed and grew stronger, and that is a beautiful thing to behold. It was amazing the way they did it. Twilight’s characters are the same all the way through, and it’s pretty boring to be honest, they just are always the same and all the different events don’t affect their personality’s in any way. THAT’S not realistic.
4. Wow, awful point. HP dialouge hold quotes about everything from love to death, to strength and courage and loss and suffering and perserverance. Twilight just has quotes in the same catergory, love. Everything is about love, i mean, it’s supposed to be a fantasy, but it has absouletely nothing about anything else, and that is boring.
5. Speical effects weren’t actually that good on Twilight. You could tell there was always a green screen, the wars were NOT epic in anyway, I mean when edward ran his legs looked like they were… well seperate, his arms and breathing was not in line with the way his legs were moving, it looked wrong.
6. Twilight is about a miserable adolescent girl who moves to a rainy town and falls in love with a peodophilic murdering vampire. The whole book is about how important it is to have a boyfriend, and how girls are nothing without boys. HP is about courage and bravery to defeat the greatest dark wizard of all time, to revenge parents, to lose friends, and to learn magic and use it for the greater good, while as well as all that, make a better love story between snape and lily in one chapter, than twilight did in 4 books.
7. Robert Pattinson looked happier in the HP movie, immediatly making him more good looking and not as kind of… sticky. Taylor Lautner isn’t actually that good looking, his body’s nice, but his face isn’t. And apparently looks are everything according to Meyer.
Hope this helps you rethink your life choices. Both books teach something, but one of them doesn’t preach the right stuff.
It’s like you want us to make fun of you.
“Harry Potter is about confronting fears, finding inner strength and doing
what is right in the face of adversity. Twilight is about how important it
is to have a boyfriend.”
-Robin Browne
By the way, I fixed your “amazing” story here: http://www.madgingr.wordpress.com
#3 : He died…what do you expect?…
I don’t think the guy is really helping with the changes……
You RETARD, when people grow up, THEY CHANGE. i wore pigtails when i was 5. then i switch to pony tails. then i braided my hair. your #3 argument is so desperate, it makes me wanna hope you are a troll for your own sake.
And yeah, our movies aren’t faithful to the books much, but yours is BECAUSE THERE ISN’T ANY SUBSTANTIAL SHIT IN TWILIGHT so they can easily cover every Goldman detail. Harry Potter just has ctoo much important stuff, you can’t fit it in a 3 hour movie.
And meaningful dialogue like what exactly? you idiot, they are just random sentences written to fill the pages. Pathetic Self Reject, Self Reject supposedly hot vampire and a masochistic no-ethics werewolf.
Don’t you even dare comparing these two. HP is like chocolate Sundae and Twilight is just Shit. on the road.
And the awesome moral of twilight?
‘get a boyfriend, weave your life around him, and live happily ever after’
i wish with all my heart that i could cruciate you to insanity.
Khajitt did a very bad job editing. It’s ‘spelling’, ‘apparently’ and ‘better’. Not a fan of double letters, are we?
1. There is nothing much in the Twilight books to leave out. They have to include the little content there is. And honestly I wish they had included everything from the Harry Potter. There would have been more movies and more Harry Potter.
By the way, Harry’s scar was never mentioned in the books as being in the middle of his forehead. It was drawn that way on the covers.
2. They have a central theme song, “Hedwig’s Theme”. It’s the movie’s identity. There’s a certain effort that has gone into making the soundtrack rather than playback someone else’s work.
A suggestion: Listen to the “Harry & Hermione” theme from Half-Blood Prince. It captures the pain of seeing someone you love, with someone else. An amazing melody.
3. You are right. It IS a whole different person. The late Richard Harris (Dumbledore One & Two) passed away and his place was filled by Michael Gambon. As for Malfoy and Hermione, the actors and characters matured and developed. For the better.
How come Victoria changed from Twilight to Eclipse? That doesn’t count, does it? People who live in glass houses, anyone?
4. That’s the problem. All they do in Twilight is TALK. One of the main reasons Twilight fails. Actions speak louder than words. The Harry Potter characters have lives. They interact with the outside world (other than with only each other) because they have to protect it from evil. They not just bat their eyelashes at each other whispering useless things.
5. Thank you. Harry Potter does have amazing special effects. Cannot say the same about Twilight though. Sorry about that.
6. Better plot? How?
7. Not really. I hated Robert Pattinson as Cedric. Never really liked him. Never thought he was good looking in any way. Kristen Stewart is pretty (I love people with green eyes) but I love how Emma Watson has evolved. Taylor Lautner has nothing more to him than abs. Alice, Jasper, Emmett, Esme, Carlisle, James, Victoria (both), Jane, Aro; none of them are great looking. The trend has passed on from the books. If an idea has manifested long enough in your brain, it is thought to be true. The only good looking character is Rosalie.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! You’re kidding, right?
Most of your points are pretty superficial, and 6 doesn’t make sense, it’s your opinion not why it’s better…
Well then… I am not going to say I didn’t feel like ripping your head off while reading this post, because I would be lying, but I’m also not going to say that you are wrong. This really is a matter of opinion. No one should have the right to tell you that you have no sense of judgement, they can tell others but have no right to say that to you! I’m sorry :3 Also, I need to tell you that you need to do your research. I thought it was weird that Dumbledore had looked different from the 2nd and 1st movie until my mom told me. Also you should know that people grow up and change. Books can include characters growing up! Percy Jackson isn’t that 12 year old anymore in the House of Hades! He is 18. And it’s a bit unnerving to see that Daniel Radcliffe grew to look much older in the 3rd movie, but I got over it. Yeah, so what if the movies didn’t follow the books well, haven’t you ever thought about the fact that some people watch the movie but don’t read the book? I even did that! They make it easier to follow along for those people! Its the same with every other book movie out there (most of the time). Please pay attention to what you put! (And I hope you get better with your dyslexia!)
Well I’m sorry that the death of the first Dumbledore inconvenienced you so….
The only OKAY thing about Twicrap is the CD with the music on it, but I’ll be a Dursley’s aunt if anyone watches a movie to listen to the background music. Upon reading this horrid article I want to stuff you into a prison cell with Umbridge! Then I want to make you have a dance party with all of Arogog’s descendants while competing in the triwizard tournament and being chased by dementors without a wand!!!!
Indian music…… *snigger* I think you maybe meant Indie music. You’re an idiot. Like, actually a true moron, and I’m very glad I stumbled upon this because it furthers my belief that Twilight actually kills brain cells and renders its fans unable to distinguish a good plot, believable characters and good acting from a sparkly, overrated, misogynistic mess of a series. Harry Potter is brilliantly thought out and brilliantly executed, both the books and the movies, from the very beginning. Twilight is a gleaming pile of bad self-insert fanfiction from the get-go. Our author is world-renowned and respected for getting our generation into literature and being humble and intelligent, yours is ridiculed constantly for being an immature and self-important racist homophobe. That isn’t a coincidence. So what you need to do is pick up a decent book or movie– go back to Frog and Toad, start small from the very beginning– and gradually work your way up to Harry Potter, since you ob–*Snape pause*– viously can’t understand the genius of the series, or its complex themes, without reforming your basic comprehension skills. How could you, when Meyers has taught you that 1+circle=green? Please stop posting online without making sure you know what you’re talking about. You’re repeatedly embarrassing yourself, and this isn’t doing anything to improve people’s opinions of yourself, your intelligence, or the fandom you’re defending.
‘Who listens to boring music like that’? Why, I do!
Twilight SUCKS DICK FOR MANY REASONS:
1. VAMPIRES ARE FUCKING RETARDED
2. THE ONLY REASON YOU LIKE THEM IS BECAUSE YOU THINK THAT THAT LAUTNER GUY IS HOT
3. PLOT IS A PIECE OF SHIT
4. WEREWOLFS ARE FUCKING AWFUL
5. YOU FUCKING FANGIRLS NEED TO SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THESE TERRIBLE ASS BOOKS AND MOVIES!
BTW- I’VE SEEN EM ALL MY EX MADE ME WATCH SO DON’T GIVE ME A BULLSHIT EXCUSS WHY I AM A DUMBASS FOR NOT THINKING THAT THIS SHIT WRITING IS GOOD.
OH YA I FORGOT, HARRY POTTER IS FOR FAGS, READ EM ALL HATED THEM AND WATCHED ALL THE MOVIES (AGAIN MY EX) AND PERCY JACKSON. I DONT KNOW WHY I DATED HER ANYWAY. HUNGER GAMES IS GOOD THOUGH.
TWILIGHT SUCKS DICK FOR MANY REASONS:
1. VAMPIRES ARE FUCKING RETARDED
2. THE ONLY REASON YOU LIKE THEM IS BECAUSE YOU THINK THAT THAT LAUTNER GUY IS HOT
3. PLOT IS A PIECE OF SHIT
4. WEREWOLFS ARE FUCKING AWFUL
5. YOU FUCKING FANGIRLS NEED TO SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THESE TERRIBLE ASS BOOKS AND MOVIES!
BTW- I’VE SEEN EM ALL MY EX MADE ME WATCH SO DON’T GIVE ME A BULLSHIT EXCUSS WHY I AM A DUMBASS FOR NOT THINKING THAT THIS SHIT WRITING IS GOOD.
OH YA I FORGOT, HARRY POTTER IS FOR FAGS, READ EM ALL HATED THEM AND WATCHED ALL THE MOVIES (AGAIN MY EX) AND PERCY JACKSON. I DONT KNOW WHY I DATED HER ANYWAY. HUNGER GAMES IS GOOD THOUGH.
Hahaha NO. Lets put this out: you are wrong.
Number 1: Wow, a scar is a little to the left. I happen to notice you didn’t mention anything bad about Twilight.
Number 2: Hello? I happen to love classical music. So do many others. Plus, putting a song like “Demons” would totally disturb the whole mystical thing. Like other things, sometimes classical (a lot of the time) is better.
Number 3: THE OLD DUMBLEDORE DIED IDIOT! IT WAS A DIFFERENT PERSON. FOOL OF A TOOK! People grow up, like Hermione did.
Number 4: Some meaningful dialogue in Twilight?! That’s as ridiculous as saying that classical music isn’t “real” music. Yeah, HP has meaningful dialogue! You just need to have a brain to understand it! Twight’s dialogue is this: “I love you!” “I will die for you!” “Stupid dog!” “I will kill you!” “Don’t look!” Harry Potter’s actually has intelligent things.
Number 5: I’m not going to mention it.
Number 6: Twilight’s STUPID plot is this: Girl meets guy. Falls in love. Random dude comes while playing baseball. Wants to eat her. Saves her. Harry Potter’s: boy gets bullied. Finds he’s a wizard. Learns magic. Saves the world and conquers death. Lets not even start on the final battles.
Number 7: THAT’S A WHAT YOU THINK! Cedric is the only character that even looks remotely good in that movie. Have you seen HP? Or did you lie?
Long story short: Go to http://www.youareanidiot.org. If that doesn’t work, search that on Google. And I’m not here because I was searching Twilight is better than HP. I found it on Google+. I was here because I needed to put some sense into people who aren’t lost to us forever.
Dude! You seriously almost got me a virus! I forgot about that website lol
Pffft…what a troll fail.
lol this is hilarious! Like siriusly ! I would write and make fun of this but other people have beat me to it. But like are you Looney? Jk u not as cool as her. Like bye. I would say you belong in hufflepuff since you will only have 2 brain cells when you are pregnant but that is an insult to the hufflepuffs…. We’ll, bye, I would arvadakervada you muggle, but the maker my day since this is so funny.
– She who shall not be named.
Indian music? Are you Sirius?
I absolutely love the harry potter books and I find this girl hilarious because she is so dumb but I do agree the movies weren’t the best I much prefer the harry potter books long live the wizard world
I’m sorry, but to be quite frank, your generalizations and assumptions in regards to music disgust me. I am a cellist and a pianist and have also written some pieces of my own. As such, I have an extensive knowledge of how music works and what it takes to write a piece of music. That said, I can quite safely assure you that those who wrote the film score for Harry Potter were not taking the easy way out or attempting to, as you say, “make a quick buck.” That would be in fact, what those in charge of the music for “Twilight” did. As opposed to writing their own film score as those in charge of the music in “Harry Potter” did, they comissioned pop, rock, and indie (not Indian) artists to write music for the movies, which also helped in drawing people who were fans of the artists to the movie. It is also far easier to write pop, indie, and rock music than instrumentals, or as you say, “Classical,” as in pop, indie, and rock music it is entirely based off of the vocals with incredibly simple instrumentals, whereas an entirely instrumental film score like that of the “Harry Potter” movies involves intricately balanced melodies, counter melodies, harmonies, and bass lines that cycle through every section of the orchestra. The “Harry Potter” film score is, in particular, an extremely intricate and difficult piece of music. All in all, it was a very good marketing and ease-based decision, but not a musical one.
In response to your comment pertaining to the popularity of what you call “Classical” music, I would like to say two things. The first being that the “Harry Potter” music is not, in fact, Classical music. The term Classical music only refers to music written during the date range of 1750-1825. The genre of music you were looking for is “Instrumental” or “Orchestral.” Second, I would like to debunk your statement. I know many, many people who listen to instrumental or orchestral music. In fact, I myself prefer it.
I make these statements not to insult you, but rather to call some rather egregious oversights pertaining to the way music works in reality to your attention.
-quantumCellist
Yes!!! Go friend! This person has clearly never read anything good, like LOTR. Is that the acronym? Whatever. This person needs to research her music.
Yes. So much yes.
1st off, on my screen at the bottom where the likes are, it says “be the first to like this” Harry Potter is better than cliché vampire romance in Twilite (however you spell it) and it always will be! Your argument actually didn’t help your side either by saying America is better than British. That’s not even cool to joke about. And saying the actors are ugly? Whoa, they’re like how they are in the book, oh wait, you won’t read it to give them a chance. Twilite is bad too. Actually, Bella and Edward (I think are the names) fit into all 15 categories for an abusive relationship. I think that concept is a little more terrifying than someone getting a spell wrong and cussing or a mother trying to save her daughter and being mad at the person who tried to kill her. Magic gives kids hope. Vampires give kids nightmares 😪 Just stating facts and my opinion.
You NEED to sort out your priorities.
I mean, Siriusly.
*Sighs* Muggles just don’t get it, do they?
She siriusly does.
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Hon, Hermione grew up, something you seem to be incapable off doing.
Oh my god. This girl is complaining about Harry Potter having small changes in a character’s appearance. The actor who played Dumbledore DIED. It’s really stupid of her to say that. It’s not wrong for someone to change their hair style or how they style it. Does it really matter?
And also, Twihards weren’t complaining when Jacob cut his hair. Or when Bella turned to a vampire and looked flawless. Or when Edward’s hair changed *so many times* in the movie saga. Hypocrite.
4. The Twilight movies are really meaningful. There’s awesome dialogue sequences and they talk about important stuff. The Harry Potter movies are mainly just a ton of action and yes, these is some important dialogue, but not as much as Twilight. And most of the important stuff gets cut out of the movies. Remember the 6th movie? It was almost nothing like the book, and they cut out most of the memories Dumbledore shows Harry!
Twilight’s main message is that you need to have a guy to be complete. HP’s lesson is about friendship, love, and that hope is stronger than fear. Which one do you guys think is better?
PS. I love how no Twilight fans have actually been brave enough to comment here.
yes
Just out of curiosity you do realize why Dumbledore looked so different after the first two movies right? The actor who played him died and so it was a knew actor after the first two
Actions speak louder than words.
Girl and boy are sitting on park bench
Girl sez to boy
“Will u luv me 4ever?”
Boy sez
“NAO”
Girl cris
She run into street and is hit by car
Boy cris
He says
“I was going to sey I will luv you
5EVER!”Dat mean he luv her more than 4ever!
Liek dis if u cri erytiem 😦
Still a better love story than twilight
SOMEONE GIVE THIS GUY A NEWBERRY AWARD
You are so dumb, I feel my brain cells burning because of you.
First of all: The actor who played Dumbledore in the first two movies DIED! Do your research.
2. The music of Harry Potter fits Harry Potter more and is way better.
3.The characters GROW UP! What do you expect?! There are seven Harry Pottee books,Harry, Ron and Hermoine etc. Are 11 in the first book and 17 in the last!
4. Meaning full? SIRIOUSLY?! Twilight has no meaning.
5. What special effects?
6. Twilight doesn’t even have a plot.
7. No they don’t. They can’t even act,at all. Please, look at Kristen Stewart and then at Emma Watson. It’s obvious that Emma is prettier
Somebody just has to Avada Kedavra this blog.
First of all, only an idiot could write something like this about Harry Potter. You have absolutely NO RIGHT to complain about their bad language when you are using even worse cusses! You are the MOST RACIST PERSON EVER. “No ofence” changes NOTHING. What is your problem with British people?! What the heck does losing a war have to do with a MOVIE?! You are apparently VERY uneducated. If you would actually PAY ATTENTION to the movie and stop criticizing it for once, you’d see how amazing it actually is. If you read the books, everything makes a lot more sense. My turn to criticize something YOU love! Twilight has absolutely NO plot line. It was a stupid idea in the first place! OOH! IT SPARKLES! I don’t see how you could be such a jerk. Don’t even TRY to stand up for yourself! Whatever you say, it’s wrong. Good luck getting FRIENDS after this! JK Rowling created brand new creatures in a whole new world, and that crazy lady just plopped something that already exists in our world and called it a story. Oh, and there’s this thing called “grammar”. You should try it sometime! Your lack of it makes you seem very unprofessional, but of course that’s what you are. 🙂 I hope you enjoyed this! It was fun. Maybe you’ll THINK before you put things on the internet. Toodles!! 😀
lol. Wait SERIOUSLY? Twilight has a better plot? Please explain why! The characters change a lot because of a tiny thing called puberty, wonder if you heard of it. And the characters are better looking? WTF KIND OF EXCUSE IS THAT! You do realize that it is more realistic for people to change their hairstyle right? And the actor who originally played Dumbledore died, its not that simple to make a different person look like someone else. Also, Harry potters music is not “classical” it is a genre called epic music. And it actually IS real music! The fact that you do not consider instrumentals “real” music and consider junk pop music real shows how stupid and narrow minded you are! The Harry potter soundtrack evokes emotion! Unlike the stupid pop stuff in Twilight. DO tell how the Twilight plot is meaningful? In Harry Potter, Ginny Weasly’s love leaves to fight a war, and she restarts Dumbledore’s Army. Hermione’s love abandons them on their quest, but she continues alone. Yet when Bella’s love leaves her, she try’s to kill herself! If their is any meaning in Twilight it is that if your boyfriend leaves you, don’t try to be a independent person just act as if their is no life anymore! Even Edwards actor (Same guy who played Cedric Diggory in Goblet of Fire) said he hated playing Edward!
1. The Twilight movies stick to the books better.
I honestly do not know I have never seen the movies. The books are pieces of shit, I could write better when I was five, so if the movies are just as good there is nothing good about them.
2. The Twilight movies have better music.
Siriusly? The Harry Potter soundtracks are original, the Twilight tracks aren’t.
3. The Twilight movies don’t drastically change the characters’ appearances. For example, Dumbledore looked completely different after the first two movies – there were major costume, wig and makeup changes. It was almost like a whole different person.
You are really an idiot, or else you’re five. It WAS a different person, you dumbass! The first Dumbledore died! DIED!
And the rest of the actors changed as they grew up. like everyone else does!
4. The Twilight movies are really meaningful. There’s awesome dialogue sequences and they talk about important stuff.
Important dialogue? I read the books (just to make fun of them). and all the “important conversations” were: “I love you, wanna get married?” “Sure, let’s have sex afterwards”
5. Ok, this isn’t a reason why Twilight is better, but I would just like to state that the Harry Potter movies have really good special effects. For example, they made Hagrid look huge, all the characters look freaky and wizardly, and they made a castle and dragons, so go HP special effects guys!
You actually made some sense!!!
And Twilight had awesome special effects too, like the vampires sparkling and the super speed and strength and things like that, not to mention all the blood, so go Twilight special effects guys too!
okay there you’re completely wrong.
6. Twilight just has a better plot. That is all.
What! What! The whole plot is the freaking Bella/Edward/Jacob love triangle!!!
7. And the Twilight characters are better looking too.
That has nothing to do with it!
And also, the HP actors were hot!!!
The reason Dumbledore “drastically changed his appearance” is because the other actor couldn’t play him anymore for health reasons. And seriously, why do you have to be so nitpicky, your like: Harry’s scar was two centimeters off, they went SO off the books! This is why the twilight fans are idiots
Woah. That is all I can say. There are so many components and aspects wrong with your argument that I cannot even begin to cover them all. First off, reading your other posts I really hope they are jokes… How can you not spell? Someone is able to make a semi-decent argument and yet can’t spell???
Second off, no. Just… No. The twilight movies are just fake. I don’t even like Harry Potter, and yet I’m siding with it. The Twilight Saga is for hopeless romantics… The Harry Potter series is for everyone… Of course your opinion is biased.
Third off, instrumentals are amazing. Lyrics draw the attention away from incredible music. All this modern rap and crap is terrible. Anyone with half a brain (very few people actually) would agree with that.
Fourth off, looks are a matter of opinion, therefore that cannot be used in your argument. My opinion is that Hermione alone is better looking than all of the people within the Twilight Saga combined.
Fifth off, there was a significant time difference between the movies. Of course people would look different!
My goooosh…. Is there anyone un your brain? Ohh…I’ll stop this now*blows her head up*
Wtf?!!!?!
Of course I am letting you have your opinion and there’s nothing wrong with liking twilight more than Harry Potter even though I don’t think that.
You can like whatever you want but you can’t be rude because of that. Especially when you criticize other people that for example likes classical music.
As I said before go on and like twilight if you want to, but there’s no need to be rude!
The Music is AMAZING! And why would they have lyrics? Hogwarts is a place with NO electronics and such, so why would they have lyrics and not only be classical? And the movies didn’t put in EVERYTHING with the Harry Potter books because there was a lot, since there was a LOT of detail in the books! Can’t really portray that in a movie, can you? They had to change Dumbledore’s appearance because the first actor for Dumbledore died. Please, don’t say that stuff unless you know why they changed appearance! And in the books the characters ALL d=change in appearance and some personality! Don’t go insulting Hermione and her hair either! Also for the special effects, I thank you for complementing it, btu vampries don’t sparkle. THEY BURN. The plot is way better in Harry Potter because it’s all just a love triangle in Twilight, just romance, no cool battles. The werewolves aren’t even real werewolves! they change whenever they want and they’re not supposed to. They’re supposed to on a full moon! And how is the Twilight characters more good looking? Bella is very pale and montone and so is Edward. Jacob is too buff and honestly they’re both clingy! I respect your opinion, but there are so many wrong parts.
If you’re looking for movies which dominate over Twilight and follow the plot of the books – Lord of the Rings. They thought the books were so good that they didn’t want to leave anything out, so there are 6 movies for 3 books.
Twilight has better music? I never listened to it so I searched it up. Apparently, it is composed by Alexandre Desplat, who also did LILY’S THEME. Movie scores shouldn’t have lyrics often. JOHN WILLIAMS IS THE BEST MOVIE SOUNDTRACK COMPOSER THERE IS FIGHT ME. Twilight has a better plot? I bet it has bigger plot holes than harry potter, too. And that is saying something. Twilight has meaningful dialogue? Such as??? I am confident that for every dialogue you quote from twilight i can quote something more meaningful from Harry Potter.